HalinTexas
昇る太陽の土&#
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2004
- Posts
- 1,536
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You need 1200 hours before you can fly canceled checks in a C-172, (part 135 PIC), but you can hop into the right seat of a CRJ900 with only 250 hours of "experience", having never been in actual IMC, above 3,000' MSL, or faster than 140 kts. Is that bazaar? Is that wrong?
That would mean that all First Officers would require 1500 total time. They would then be qualified to fly the airplane. The regionals cannont afford qualified FO's. They want to staff the right seat with the least amount of money. That's why you see 19 year old kids with 14 hours of Multi and 255 hours total time.New FAA rule: All new hires at P121 operations shall have an ATP-MEL upon commencement of training.
You got it. He was a student at that wreckless, joke of a flight school, Gulfstream. Just like the 2 Pinnacle pilots who crashed. Both from Gulfstream. Does anyone see a trend hear?Where did the Captain train in FL? Was he at Gulfstream?
You got it. He was a student at that wreckless, joke of a flight school, Gulfstream. Just like the 2 Pinnacle pilots who crashed. Both from Gulfstream. Does anyone see a trend hear?
Shut that freaking place down NOW!!!
I have no doubt that every airline checks for speed management on approach. I have no doubt these pilots were trained in that and checked on it.
Not every airline pays for a FOQUA program that far more effectivly monitors real world performance than the once every now and then line check. To implement an effective FOQUA program costs money, and the FAA does not require it. Any airline that goes beyond FAA minimums places itself at risk of losing the next RFP.
QUOTE]I believe the airlines will hire the best pilots available to them at the time. To do otherwise is not in their best interests.[/
What you should have written was : I believe the airlines will hire the best available pilots to them at the price point they are willing to pay. To do otherwise is not in their best interest come RFP time
Sorry to be contrary, but,......I don't think they will. Neither will (___insert your least favorite sub-standard regional airline here___).
What standards would you impose that would have prevented this accident?
I hope the NTSB takes a look at what happened before they reported. From what I have read the captain slept in the crewroom and the FO non reved on a redeye the night before. They need to get these rest req's under control. This reduced rest bs has got to stop.
Do you want Uncle Fed to start regulating a commute - or require you to live in domicile?
A commute is a personal choice, however, as a professional (I commute too), it is my responsibility to insure that when I do report, that I am mentally as well as physically ready for anything when I get there. That means that, for me, I commute in in enough time to be able to take at least a good 3-4 hour power nap (if I am working an afternoon/midnite desk), or commute in the day prior if I am on a morning desk.
You want to see a real blood bath - have Uncle Fed require all pilots (and dispatchers too, there are a few of us who commute) to live in domicile.
In no way does any of the above mean that I think the crew of 3407 was unprofessional - I havent heard the tapes, read the CVR transcript, nor have I read much about the accident.