Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

What's that sound? I think I hear props!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
"coasting to landings by idling the engines."

that's in the linked article above...not sure who is operating with the cost effective dead stick landings...

though the rise of the turbo-prop means more "regional" level jobs, and less "major" level jobs, looks like i ll be in the Beech a little longer than expected
 
As long as pay is commensurate with the size/passenger carrying capabilities of the airplane, who cares if it's a jet or a prop. The bigger the airplane the bigger the pay check. If I can make $120,000 flying 50 pax in a jet, I expect to make at least $20,000 more flying 70 in a prop or a jet.
 
Last edited:
Did 11 legs in one day on upgrade IOE in the Beech 1900 a few years back.
 
"coasting to landings by idling the engines."

that's in the linked article above...not sure who is operating with the cost effective dead stick landings...

though the rise of the turbo-prop means more "regional" level jobs, and less "major" level jobs, looks like i ll be in the Beech a little longer than expected

Man that avatar gets me everytime.
 
Too bad it can't be like british airways or UPS. Making the same rate, regardless of how big the airplane is... A lot of senior guys in Majors across the pond fly the Dash!!! It's more based on what type of schedule/lifestyle you want, rather than chasing types for the cash.
 
LanceAir said:
Athough the rise of the turbo-prop means more "regional" level jobs, and less "major" level jobs, looks like i ll be in the Beech a little longer than expected

Be much less concerned about large turboprops taking away major jobs than large "small jets".
 
Hell yeah, nothing like a 7+ legs a day on the mighty SAAB. Puts some hair on your chest, makes you into a real man

Please.... that thing's a Cadillac compared to a hand-flown 1900!



Know why the 1900 has its yoke mounted to the dash instead of a column?

To make room for the pilot's balls. :D
 
I would love to see us get q400's to replace the saab as the leases expire...who knows though.
 
As long as pay is commensurate with the size/passenger carrying capabilities of the airplane, who cares if it's a jet or a prop. The bigger the airplane the bigger the pay check. If I can make $120,000 flying 50 pax in a jet, I expect to make at least $20,000 more flying 70 in a prop or a jet.

Haha right. Good luck with that. Less is the new norm
 
I have 5000 hrs in the E-145 and its no G-5 but I have never had a single major failure or serious issue. Guys love to bitch about it but honestly, it does what it was designed to do and does it pretty well. Perhaps I was lucky. XJT takes very good care of its fleet and that could be the reason for my good fortune but that airplane was very good to me.

I also spent some time in both seats of the ATR and it was a helluva time. I just don't like more than 3 legs a day and props = hard work.
 
I can't believe no one has said it yet:

PROPS ARE FOR BOATS!!

**Except the Q400....it's the ********************!
 
though the rise of the turbo-prop means more "regional" level jobs, and less "major" level jobs, looks like i ll be in the Beech a little longer than expected

I don't think this means more regional jobs in the long run. I think it does mean less regional jets. Lets just hope majors don't allow more scope relief.

11 legs in the Metro. Ouch. The most I ever had to do in the Saab was 9.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top