Geronimo4497
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2004
- Posts
- 591
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sstearns2 said:BE-56TC
short body baron, duke engines.
Scott
EatSleepFly said:Wouldn't a Duke w/ Baron engines be a better choice?
I thought Duke's were big maintenance hogs because of the engines (are they geared, by the way?).
They look nice though.
If I were buying a twin, and money was not a huge factor, I'd definitely go for something Beechcraft.
I've flown a couple different 56TCs and have several hundred hours in them. What a hot-rod! A straight 55 was just as fast up to about 8,000' or so, but after that there was no contest. I understand that there are STC'd mods to fix the cam problem with the big Lycomings. (They were not geared.) We never had any problems with the engines; however, ours had the early ni-cad batteries which were a real pain.EatSleepFly said:Wouldn't a Duke w/ Baron engines be a better choice?
I thought Duke's were big maintenance hogs because of the engines (are they geared, by the way?).
They look nice though.
If I were buying a twin, and money was not a huge factor, I'd definitely go for something Beechcraft.
Lead Sled said:When I was checked out in the airplane we topped off the tanks, had 4 people on board, and put sandbags in the baggage compartment to bring us up to maximum gross takeoff weight. At that weight, the airplane had about a 500 fpm rate of climb with gear down, full flaps, and a wind-milling engine. It was the closest thing to piston-powered jet performance you'll ever see. The checkpilot had me shut one down in flight and we still were able to true out at around 185 kts. It was faster on one engine than our Aztec was on two.
Oh well, it was fun to fly, but I'd hate to have to pay the fuel bill for it now.
'Sled