PropsForward
Will Fly 4 Food
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2004
- Posts
- 374
Inoperative Equipment
Bummer, I was really hoping to avoid this one... <G>
Ok, 91.213 has 4 parts. Let’s review.
(d) is real easy. We do not have an MEL so (hopefully) we are in the right place.
(1) Easy. We are talking about a non-turbine powered airplane.
(2) Talks about 91.205. I don't believe this area is in question at this time...
(3)(i) Easy. If a mechanic removed it, the mechanic did a logbook entry.
(3)(ii) This is where I think the confusion is. Simply put, if it requires maintenance to disable the item, then you get to go to part 43 and review a whole bunch of grey area regs. If it does not, then use the K.I.S.S. philosophy. (Keep it sweet and simple).
(4) Just says a pilot can declare the item broke, and determine it is still safe to fly.
So, to answer your question. In this case (a dead OAT), 91.213(4) allows us to say the item is broke, it makes us use other methods of getting the needed information for performance, endurance, staying out of icing conditions, density altitude, etc, etc, etc. and determine it is still safe to go flying. 91.213(3)(ii) says that because we used (4) to get here, that we need to placard it INOP and since nothing needs to be done to disable it, we stop at applying the sticker labeled "INOP" and do not need to make any logbook notations. (key word in the reg. is "If").
Scenerio #2
If 91.213(3)(i) was used then everything is moot. A mechanic has made the determination for us and made an entry in the logbook. (Like when you rent an airplane and COM1 is a black hole where the KX-155 used to be).
Scenerio #3.
Lets play a little with 91.213(3)(ii) and get something that does need a note in the logbook. Let’s say the ADF is dead. Ok, so 91.213(4) – we determine it is broke because the needle is lying in the bottom of the instrument. We determine is safe to fly. 91.213(3)(ii) – We put a sticker labeled “INOP” on the glass of the instrument. Personally I would stop here since the ADF radio is not broke and it does have one of them cool-guy flight timers built in that I may want to use to time an approach or something. But for this, let’s go ahead and disable it. So we pop the circuit breaker and perhaps even secure a zip-tie to it (Skipping the can of worms part 43 for now). We note in the logbook that we disabled the item and blast off. Kewl.
Part 43. (What a nightmare).
43.3(g) The holder of a pilot certificate issued under Part 61 may perform preventive maintenance on any aircraft owned or operated by that pilot which is not used under Part 121, 129, or 135.
Ok, good to go so far…
We go to Part 43 Appendix A (c) and review the list of 32 items we can “maintain” and the item at hand (circuit breakers) is not listed! Uh Oh? Now what do we do?
Well, we can say it is not preventive maintenance (which is true), and determine the circuit breaker is user/pilot control that is within our authority to simply turn off.
So now. All is fine and dandy. But wait! We lost this ADF while enroute to Point B and need to return to base. And as luck would have it, the aircraft logbooks are back at the FBO. Now what do we do???
Squawk sheets is an even bigger nightmare in the FAA paperwork airworthyness arena.
Whew!
Ralgha said:If you don't record the determination in the maintenance records, and something comes into question, you'll get burned.
Bummer, I was really hoping to avoid this one... <G>
(d) Except for operations conducted in accordance with paragraph (a) or (c) of this section, a person may takeoff an aircraft in operations conducted under this part with inoperative instruments and equipment without an approved Minimum Equipment List provided --
(1) The flight operation is conducted in a --
(i) Rotorcraft, nonturbine-powered airplane, glider, or lighter-than-air aircraft for which a master Minimum Equipment List has not been developed; or
(ii) <snip!>; and
(2) The inoperative instruments and equipment are not --
(i) Part of the VFR-day type certification instruments and equipment prescribed in the applicable airworthiness regulations under which the aircraft was type certificated;
(ii) Indicated as required on the aircraft's equipment list, or on the Kinds of Operations Equipment List for the kind of flight operation being conducted;
(iii) Required by §91.205 or any other rule of this part for the specific kind of flight operation being conducted; or
(iv) Required to be operational by an airworthiness directive; and
(3) The inoperative instruments and equipment are --
(i) Removed from the aircraft, the cockpit control placarded, and the maintenance recorded in accordance with §43.9 of this chapter; or
(ii) Deactivated and placarded "Inoperative." If deactivation of the inoperative instrument or equipment involves maintenance, it must be accomplished and recorded in accordance with part 43 of this chapter; and
(4) A determination is made by a pilot, who is certificated and appropriately rated under part 61 of this chapter, or by a person, who is certificated and appropriately rated to perform maintenance on the aircraft, that the inoperative instrument or equipment does not constitute a hazard to the aircraft.
Ok, 91.213 has 4 parts. Let’s review.
(d) is real easy. We do not have an MEL so (hopefully) we are in the right place.
(1) Easy. We are talking about a non-turbine powered airplane.
(2) Talks about 91.205. I don't believe this area is in question at this time...
(3)(i) Easy. If a mechanic removed it, the mechanic did a logbook entry.
(3)(ii) This is where I think the confusion is. Simply put, if it requires maintenance to disable the item, then you get to go to part 43 and review a whole bunch of grey area regs. If it does not, then use the K.I.S.S. philosophy. (Keep it sweet and simple).
(4) Just says a pilot can declare the item broke, and determine it is still safe to fly.
So, to answer your question. In this case (a dead OAT), 91.213(4) allows us to say the item is broke, it makes us use other methods of getting the needed information for performance, endurance, staying out of icing conditions, density altitude, etc, etc, etc. and determine it is still safe to go flying. 91.213(3)(ii) says that because we used (4) to get here, that we need to placard it INOP and since nothing needs to be done to disable it, we stop at applying the sticker labeled "INOP" and do not need to make any logbook notations. (key word in the reg. is "If").
Scenerio #2
If 91.213(3)(i) was used then everything is moot. A mechanic has made the determination for us and made an entry in the logbook. (Like when you rent an airplane and COM1 is a black hole where the KX-155 used to be).
Scenerio #3.
Lets play a little with 91.213(3)(ii) and get something that does need a note in the logbook. Let’s say the ADF is dead. Ok, so 91.213(4) – we determine it is broke because the needle is lying in the bottom of the instrument. We determine is safe to fly. 91.213(3)(ii) – We put a sticker labeled “INOP” on the glass of the instrument. Personally I would stop here since the ADF radio is not broke and it does have one of them cool-guy flight timers built in that I may want to use to time an approach or something. But for this, let’s go ahead and disable it. So we pop the circuit breaker and perhaps even secure a zip-tie to it (Skipping the can of worms part 43 for now). We note in the logbook that we disabled the item and blast off. Kewl.
Part 43. (What a nightmare).
43.3(g) The holder of a pilot certificate issued under Part 61 may perform preventive maintenance on any aircraft owned or operated by that pilot which is not used under Part 121, 129, or 135.
Ok, good to go so far…
We go to Part 43 Appendix A (c) and review the list of 32 items we can “maintain” and the item at hand (circuit breakers) is not listed! Uh Oh? Now what do we do?
Well, we can say it is not preventive maintenance (which is true), and determine the circuit breaker is user/pilot control that is within our authority to simply turn off.
So now. All is fine and dandy. But wait! We lost this ADF while enroute to Point B and need to return to base. And as luck would have it, the aircraft logbooks are back at the FBO. Now what do we do???
Squawk sheets is an even bigger nightmare in the FAA paperwork airworthyness arena.
Whew!
Last edited: