What do you mean it wasn't Southwest's fault...Salk

[GoodTimes]

Lucky,

Stop now before you make it worse.

 

[SKC]

Ouch. :laugh:

 

[Hose A. Jiminez]

No amount of factual information will deter OYS/GL.

Haters gotta hate.

I will not be convinced that gl/oys are not the same person. If I'm wrong it's of no consequence because they are equally irrelevant.

 

[Skyboy722]

Lucky,

Not too bright, dude.

Are you the jackwagon slowing us all down on the Fisel Arrival in FLL?

 

[say again]

Lucky,

Not too bright, dude.

No he is not!!

 

[say again]

And proof of another dangerous SWAPA pilot flying your family and friends in violation of Boeings limitations.

SWA thinks limitations are just suggestions to follow when it is convenient.

I will write real slow for the SWAPA pilots who need the tutoring.

250 k below 10k is a design limitation. period. end of discussion. fact.

Birds fly below 10k and wind screens are designed to withstand a bird strike below 250 knots. Not 259, 260, 261, or 270, but 250 or slower.

Staker is another SWA pilot who doesn't know what he is doing.

You are a complete moron!!!!!! :beer:

 

[densoo]

350 knots plus! She was past Boeing's flight test data of Vd by a wide margin. Boeing said privately the plane should have crashed.

SWA gave her 2 weeks off.

And the FO? Or is it Rex Lex there.

 

[PBRstreetgang]

Hey,
Why can Canadian 737s exceed 250 below 10K.
Side note, I heard from a person fairly well connected to the FAA that the 73s in question were inspected by a contract MX firm, who used a metal scraper to remove sealant, instead of the SRM mandated plastic scraper, and the metal scraper scratched the skin causing stress risers and ultimate failures.
I guess we will see.....
PBR

 

[LeeRoyJenkins]

Hey,
Side note, I heard from a person fairly well connected to the FAA that the 73s in question were inspected by a contract MX firm, who used a metal scraper to remove sealant, instead of the SRM mandated plastic scraper, and the metal scraper scratched the skin causing stress risers and ultimate failures.
I guess we will see.....
PBR

The problem started at the assembly line. Boeing has already admitted this.

 

[Tripower455]

And proof of another dangerous SWAPA pilot flying your family and friends in violation of Boeings limitations.

SWA thinks limitations are just suggestions to follow when it is convenient.

I will write real slow for the SWAPA pilots who need the tutoring.

250 k below 10k is a design limitation. period. end of discussion. fact.

Birds fly below 10k and wind screens are designed to withstand a bird strike below 250 knots. Not 259, 260, 261, or 270, but 250 or slower.

Staker is another SWA pilot who doesn't know what he is doing.

You really are lucky to have a job, if you actually have one. Hopefully, it's not flying airliners.