Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Was relative or DOH rejected by SW/AAI?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Hahahaha that's some funny stuff right there. Even the thought of arbitration seems to be rejected by the WN pilots who post here. If their argument is valid, the Arbitrator will see it their way. Why are they so upset?
 
There was a notion that DOH was traded for all the undefined protections in SL9 such as junior CA keeping seats.

I am being told that nothing regarding seniority is fair in SW eyes due to their retirements so looks like arbitration followed by po ed pilots and rich attorneys.
 
Interesting comments Wood Pecker. But at the end of the day, if a binding arbitration award is issued, and the majority doesn't like it (in this case the SWAPA), they simply refuse to negotiate a combined list. Seeing how the precedence has been set. How may years ago was AWA/USAir...7 years now? How close are they to Nic being implemented?

Yeah baby.....
 
Ultra

No one wants this. The scenario you describe (USAIR east v. west) is ugly for both sides.

All of the interested parties should hope/pray that they can come up with a negotiated agreement before we go to arbitration. At least they are talking.

Cheers.
 
Honest question...


Do you REALLY think ALPA wants a negotiated settlement?

Not slamming the MC, but I just don't see the MEC signing off on anything at this point.

RF
 

Latest resources

Back
Top