CRJ_Driver
The Man
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2001
- Posts
- 224
I voted H*LL NO as well
I voted No on the TA.
I attented the road show and read the e-mails and I believe the MEC doesn't want to clearly answer questions, Mgt is playing funny games and all the CP's shouldn't give their perspective on the TA. Did you notice how all 3 groups above fully support a yes vote.
Now, a lot of you will tell me...well thats right...if all 3 say vote yes, you should believe thats the right thing to do right there. Ohh yeah, go to a road show and get informed.
I was at a road show, I am informed as I am going to be. I have a lot to lose if I get furloughed but I still voted NO.
Give me why I should vote yes, based on fact NOT speculation and perhaps I will change my mind.
Skywest sucks b/c they get status pay. So do I as a RJ FO at ACA. I also take a -7.5% paycut. And likening our TA rates to other carriers is not valid in my bood brother b/c Comair and ASA haven't adjusted their rates yet. Lets just automatically believe we are the TOP BOTTOM FEEDER of the industry. Give me a break.
The MEC and everybody else, says pilot costs are critical. Yes, LABOR is critical and mgt did cut labor already and the TA cuts it some more. But Skywest took status pay and got 20 RJ's. We took a paycut and got offered 10 RJ's and UAL reserving the right to enact a decling fleet. So, I am going to vote Yes for a contract that as of right now is being rejected by mgt. (TM hotline) TM and KS have to travel to ORD to visit UAL and talk and thats based off the TA bid as I understand it.
I hear talk of a trophy and thats why I should vote YES. You tell me what the trophy and better yet, see it and will vote YES if its a good one. But if I hold it and I like it...well it doesn't mean its a freakin trophy. It could just be a freaking mini statue. Get serious and vote NO for this thing.
Either way is uncertain and YES I'll grant you a yes vote is least risky. BUT, I don't know how much least risk that is and since nobody can tell me...I vote NO.
Its evident that we can re-nogiate b/c TM and KS are doing that right now with UAL. If our NO to the TA proves its the wrong move...then we'll vote again and vote YES and go back to UAL.
Ohh thats not realistic you say. You are not realistic. I will not go to the bottom of this industry and expect to go to NWA or AAL and live a **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED**ty life $ wise. I will not compare myself to Mesaba or MESA. You give me proof and not some freaking mind show that visited all of our hubs and maybe I'll vote yes. Confidentiallity....ha ha ha.
BTW: The bomb shell will probably be leaked near the end of voting....so all the no voters will change their mind and re-cast the ballots. If you're smart, you will leak the info with details. If you are not...you will get a REJECTED TA!
Stay unified, stay informed, fly safely, VOTE!
I voted No on the TA.
I attented the road show and read the e-mails and I believe the MEC doesn't want to clearly answer questions, Mgt is playing funny games and all the CP's shouldn't give their perspective on the TA. Did you notice how all 3 groups above fully support a yes vote.
Now, a lot of you will tell me...well thats right...if all 3 say vote yes, you should believe thats the right thing to do right there. Ohh yeah, go to a road show and get informed.
I was at a road show, I am informed as I am going to be. I have a lot to lose if I get furloughed but I still voted NO.
Give me why I should vote yes, based on fact NOT speculation and perhaps I will change my mind.
Skywest sucks b/c they get status pay. So do I as a RJ FO at ACA. I also take a -7.5% paycut. And likening our TA rates to other carriers is not valid in my bood brother b/c Comair and ASA haven't adjusted their rates yet. Lets just automatically believe we are the TOP BOTTOM FEEDER of the industry. Give me a break.
The MEC and everybody else, says pilot costs are critical. Yes, LABOR is critical and mgt did cut labor already and the TA cuts it some more. But Skywest took status pay and got 20 RJ's. We took a paycut and got offered 10 RJ's and UAL reserving the right to enact a decling fleet. So, I am going to vote Yes for a contract that as of right now is being rejected by mgt. (TM hotline) TM and KS have to travel to ORD to visit UAL and talk and thats based off the TA bid as I understand it.
I hear talk of a trophy and thats why I should vote YES. You tell me what the trophy and better yet, see it and will vote YES if its a good one. But if I hold it and I like it...well it doesn't mean its a freakin trophy. It could just be a freaking mini statue. Get serious and vote NO for this thing.
Either way is uncertain and YES I'll grant you a yes vote is least risky. BUT, I don't know how much least risk that is and since nobody can tell me...I vote NO.
Its evident that we can re-nogiate b/c TM and KS are doing that right now with UAL. If our NO to the TA proves its the wrong move...then we'll vote again and vote YES and go back to UAL.
Ohh thats not realistic you say. You are not realistic. I will not go to the bottom of this industry and expect to go to NWA or AAL and live a **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED**ty life $ wise. I will not compare myself to Mesaba or MESA. You give me proof and not some freaking mind show that visited all of our hubs and maybe I'll vote yes. Confidentiallity....ha ha ha.
BTW: The bomb shell will probably be leaked near the end of voting....so all the no voters will change their mind and re-cast the ballots. If you're smart, you will leak the info with details. If you are not...you will get a REJECTED TA!
Stay unified, stay informed, fly safely, VOTE!