Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

USAPA wins appeal!!!!!!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You don't seem to understand how USAPA's DFR applies to the former AWA pilots. Seham apparently doesn't either. Oh well, see you in court.


Well now I believe you asked if I understood what DFR is. As a matter of fact I do. It's basically the duty of the union to represent it's membership fairly and equal.

Now you added the part of how USAPA's (alleged and subsequently thrown out of court DFR) Applies to former AWA pilots.

This I would love to hear how you figure former AWA have been subject to non DFR by USAPA????!?!?!?
 
In addtion:

Actually, the 9th acknowledged the union's duty to fairly represent the pilots.

The Nic was an internal union attempt that failed as is. The court acknowledged that ALPA was free to abandon Nic and that USAPA is equally free. The duty to fairly represent remains, but is not embodied in an ALPA policy or process. It is clear that any future possible court case on a USAPA breach of DFR will not be held to the standards of ALPA policies. ALPA, USAPA, or any other union's compliance with their Duty of Fair Representation is judged by standards superior to their own or other union policies.
 
We could've had a new contract in 2007 when the economy was good and the company profitable.

Which would have also negated the possibility of us winning our LOA93 grievance, bringing our pay higher than what would have been negotiated in '07........ It would have been a nice raise for you guys, but a self imposed pay cut for us....
 
It's basically the duty of the union to represent it's membership fairly and equal.
Good, then we're in agreement. As long as USAPA lives up to that we'll all save a lot of money on legal fees.

You'd asked me how I'd integrate lists and I told you. You think an organization dominated by the East will be more unbiased than an arbitrator?
 
Good, then we're in agreement. As long as USAPA lives up to that we'll all save a lot of money on legal fees.

You'd asked me how I'd integrate lists and I told you. You think an organization dominated by the East will be more unbiased than an arbitrator?


We are one happy family now. We discuss things with the leaders who are crafting the next CBA in negotiations with the company, the leaders put out a vote, and we all go thumbs up or down.

Tell your union what you want to see in the CBA they are working on.
 
Sure we agree. And hopefully USAPA comes up with an integration that PROTECTS both sides. The nic obviously did not do this.

suspicious of what usapa may bring, but until you guys stop looking at those broken crystal balls, and wait to see what actually happens, you'll never know.
 
Also, how well versed on the C&R's are you guys? I haven't looked at them in a while, but I remember being impressed with how many situations they covered to protect west pilots from east invasion of their bases...well, base....while allowing movement as positions open up. I know that a hell of a lot of work went into making sure everyone's interests were considered, within the frame work of when you were hired.

And that's a great thing, IMO. I've never wanted to see anyone screwed by this or any other merger. Flow through, too; I've always been a believer that any flow through should be a good deal for both sides. ALPA AAA was always trying to skew it so the WO's got slammed, which is reason 157 why ALPA is gone, those f&^%ers.
Anyway, trying to represent everyone is challenging, and that's why those C&R's are somewhat complicated.

Last guy I flew with said he was on a west JS and the crew actually agreed with him that in many cases, like wanting to retain a PHX base, you guys were better off with the C&R's than with Nic.
 
From the law offices of Flywheel Shyster and Flywheel.
Waldorf T. Flywheel - Sr. Partner



Phone rings: Miss Dimple answers- Flywheel , Shyster and Flywheel….Mr. Flywheel? Just a second; I’ll call him. (Calling out) - Mr. Flywheel! There’s a man on the phone. He says he found the book you lost.

Flywheel: Give me the phone, I’ll talk to him. Hello…..Yes this Mr. Flywheel……so you found my book eh?..... Oh, you needn’t bother about bringing it over. You can read it to me over the phone. Start a page 150. That’s where I left off…….Hello! .. Hello! Hmmm (Sneers) He hung up on me. After I go to the trouble of putting aside legal business just to talk to him!

Miss Dimple: Legal business? Why Mr. Flywheel, you were doing a crossword puzzle.

Mr. Flywheel: Well, is doing a crossword puzzle illegal? Say, has that assistant of mine, Ravelli, been in this morning?

Miss Dimple: No sir

Mr. Flywheel: Well when he gets here have him go down to the Post Office and mail this letter.

Miss Dimple: But sir, It hasn’t’ got a stamp on it.

Mr. Flywheel: Well tell him to put it in the mailbox when nobody is looking.

Miss Dimple: But Mr. Flywheel, a stamp only costs 47cents.

Mr. Flywheel: For 47 cents, I’ll deliver it myself.

Miss Dimple: Anyway this letter is too heavy we had better put two stamps on it.

Mr. Flywheel: Nonsense, if we put two stamps on it will be heavier still. On second thought , never mind the letter. It’s just a little invoice to my friends at Leonidas asking for $1.821 million dollars. When we last sent them an invoice like this they came down to the Office to complain. I told them in no uncertain terms they had to pay up. They got mad; all in a huff. I told them to calm down and not leave in a huff. They could stay for a minute and if they were still mad then they could leave in a minute and a huff. If that wasn’t quick enough they could leave in a cab.

The Leonidas guys have been pestering me about doing something about this bill. I suggested they just pay it. I have been very philosophical with them… trying to get them to see things in a different light…

…. A man's only as old as the woman he feels.
…..Anyone who says he can see through women is missing a lot.
… I intend to live forever, or die trying.
… Behind every successful man is a woman, behind her is his wife.
…..Who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?
… These are my principles, if you don’t like them, I have others.
…..My favorite poem is the one that starts 'Thirty days hath September' because it actually tells you something.

I don’t think these guys respond well the philosophical, we haven’t been paid in full yet,.

Here is the invoice, and it goes back to September of 2009. Who knows how big it is now.

Leonidas LLC
Attn: Jeffrey Koontz
2650 FM 407, Ste. 145-147
Bartonville, TX 76226

September 3, 2009
Invoice No: ******
File No: LEO020-324277
Re: Leonidas LLC vs. Airline Pilots, et al.


Invoice Summary
Current Professional Services $1,678,300.50
Current Disbursements 142,929.37

Total Current Invoice $1,821,229.87


Questions regarding payments or accounts, please call (816) 572-4664
or 1-877-577-7455 or [email protected].
For other inquiries, please contact Marty Harper at (602)650-2000
or [email protected].

Please make checks payable to
Polsinelli Shughart PC
P.O. Box 878681
Kansas City, MO 64187-8681
Wire Instructions:
US Bank
Acct: Polsinelli Shughart, PC
Acct #: 4343953230
ABA #: 101000187
Please reference Invoice No.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top