Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

USAPA Trial

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Has anyone attended in the last day or so? Is it starting to wrap up?
 
Tale of Two "??????s".

Someone else can fill in the blank...
 
Hi TZ.........nice post.

Trying to use facts to educate the USAPA minions is a waste of time.

It's their way or the highway.

Hopefully in a couple of weeks, Seham, Brengle, and all his D-Bag defense team will get a humiliating kick in the crotch.

Stay tuned...........airbusbb


He Lee and Brengle.......how's that steel toed cowboy boot feeling between the legs??

You two are F'n D-Bags. Glad you lost for your fellow usapians.

Now you usapians.......you gonna keep spending money on attorneys or accept the fact that your sham orgainization is a failed experiment.

Ninth district will deny your appeal.
 
Fat chance the appelate courts are going to overturn the verdict. USAPA is making Seham a very rich man.

I'd be careful how I spend my money when getting legal advice saying binding is really not binding.
 
Excuse me , that was not a "purchase" or "merge" your company had to pay to play....

Airways sucked a fee out of your company just to let you have the 'privilege" to fly for them....
This "investment" gave new meaning to the term outsourcing a contract carrier!

Uh, actually, no. AWA was so desparate for cash to emerge from CH11 that they accepted $125 Million from AWAC to finance their emergence from CH11 and that in exchange for that AWAC was able to place 70 aircraft in service for USAirways until 2015 as well as stock options (which our owners have made a mint on) and a seat on the BOD of AWA.

You are correct, however in that it created the term 'pay to play'. The point of DD's original post is that the $125M was OUR (the pilots) money culled fom concessions while we flew for UAL, that said money was used to finance AWA's emerence from BK, and that we had NO SAY in how it was used, hence what about our rights and expectations in all of this, since it was OUR money!

Peace.

Rekks

PS. BtoB, you are an ass.
 
Uh, actually, no. AWA was so desparate for cash to emerge from CH11 that they accepted $125 Million from AWAC to finance their emergence from CH11 and that in exchange for that AWAC was able to place 70 aircraft in service for USAirways until 2015 as well as stock options (which our owners have made a mint on) and a seat on the BOD of AWA.

You are correct, however in that it created the term 'pay to play'. The point of DD's original post is that the $125M was OUR (the pilots) money culled fom concessions while we flew for UAL, that said money was used to finance AWA's emerence from BK, and that we had NO SAY in how it was used, hence what about our rights and expectations in all of this, since it was OUR money!

Peace.

Rekks

PS. BtoB, you are an ass.

Hey dumbass.......do your homework......AWA was not in BK. USAirways (East) was in BK not AWA.

Don't post dumbass arguments if you don't have the facts.
 
Careful there, that kind of response will get you the label,'USAPA Apologist" from the TWA Dude!!! You wouldn't want that.
So then you're not a USAPA apologist? You support their cause (which George Nicolau, two pilot neutrals, Judge Wake, and a jury of nine didn't). That makes you an apologist for them.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom