Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Usapa loses case in federal court!!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter becket
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 10

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Usapa already put a news release out that says the ninth circuit and supreme courts are the true places to vet the law.

They still don't get it, not that they ever will.
 
When does th thread start concerning the appeal
Our favorite USAPA apologist speaks again. Within a week Judge Wake will issue his remedy injunction. Guess who decides whether to stay that injunction pending appeal? Judge Wake. In other words, the injuction will stick while Seham continues to bill hundreds of hours of useless legal work. The appeal will either not be heard or will go nowhere. Guaranteed.

You should find some other group of malcontents to apologize for.
 
Last edited:
The judge decides whether Usapa gets a stay? If it is true, that the effects will be felt immediately, as in not awaiting an appeal, this will all be a bad memory soon.
 
and the remedy?

back to seperate votes or something stronger than that?

It will probably be next week before the judge issues remedies. However, the plaintiffs asked for 4 remedies. During discussion of those the judge seemed amenable to the one requiring that the Nicolau arbitrated list be the only list in any negotiated and proposed contract. He also was leaning towards single group ratification rather than east/west group ratification.

Whatever else there may be it seems clear that USAPA will not be allowed to negotiate nor present a tentative agreement that does not include the arbitration award as part of the negotiated agreement. Plaintiffs also asked for implementation of the arbitrated seniority list by a date certain in the event USAPA stalls or does not negotiate for a new contract including the Nic.
 
It will probably be next week before the judge issues remedies. However, the plaintiffs asked for 4 remedies. During discussion of those the judge seemed amenable to the one requiring that the Nicolau arbitrated list be the only list in any negotiated and proposed contract. He also was leaning towards single group ratification rather than east/west group ratification.

Whatever else there may be it seems clear that USAPA will not be allowed to negotiate nor present a tentative agreement that does not include the arbitration award as part of the negotiated agreement. Plaintiffs also asked for implementation of the arbitrated seniority list by a date certain in the event USAPA stalls or does not negotiate for a new contract including the Nic.[/QUOTE]

While I wish this was true it was not brought up in court today.
 
It's about time. I'd like to see some monetary damages with the senior Easties in charge hit hard on this one. What they did was completely ridiculous...
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom