Usapa loses case in federal court!!!!

[becket]

Verdict Just In.

USAPA GUILTY OF DFR

 

[Sandhawk]

Verdict Just In.

USAPA GUILTY OF DFR

That's what you get with a bunch of scabs in a van down by the river........

Good Job First Officer Bradford !!! Thanks for the SMOKING GUN !!!

imp:

 

[ualdriver]

Verdict Just In.

USAPA GUILTY OF DFR

Are you sure? Didn't it just go to the jury?

 

[Sandhawk]

Are you sure? Didn't it just go to the jury?

Jury went to deliberations at 4pm yesterday - verdict out just now.........

That's what happens when you have an ambulance chaser for an attorney and NO legal leg to stand on!

 

[becket]

Are you sure? Didn't it just go to the jury?

Yep. When You're so far over the legal line, it's pretty easy for a jury to make a quick decision.

TO ALL EASTIES, THE USAPA EXPERIMENT HAS ALREADY COST YOU HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN LOST PAY, BENEFITS, AND LEGAL BILLS.

IT'S TIME TO HAVE A FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE IN THIS AIRLINES UNION.

 

[ualdriver]

Jury went to deliberations at 4pm yesterday - verdict out just now.........

That's what happens when you have an ambulance chaser for an attorney!

Congrats to the West guys if it's true!

 

[Ocity]

Awesome!!!

USAPA is an abomination that was finally put in it's place.

I guess the system really does work sometimes.

 

[Crzipilot]

and the remedy?

back to seperate votes or something stronger than that?

 

[captfred]

It could not happen to a nicer bunch of pompous, self-entitled morons.

 

[d.fitz]

Welcome back Mr. Nicolau....

 

[cactusboy53]

and the remedy?

back to seperate votes or something stronger than that?

Yes, possible. I think the judge knows that having the two sides vote separately would still cause an impasse. I don't think he will let that happen, do you?

 

[PHXFLYR]

Verdict Just In.

USAPA GUILTY OF DFR

Yeah, Baby !!!!!!!

PHXFLYR

A very proud non-member

Yeah,Baby !!!!

:beer:

 

[eaglesview]

When does th thread start concerning the appeal

 

[Raoul Duke]

When the verdict was read, USAPA read a prepared statement notifying the Jury that they had decertified USAPA and that they had formed a new - new union to void the jury's verdict and that they were requesting the judge to assign a blue ribbon panel to review the clear bias of the jurors and asked that sky god Sully be assigned as the chairman of the committee. They also requested that the committee be called the "Integrity Search Committee".

 

[Sandhawk]

When the verdict was read, USAPA read a prepared statement notifying the Jury that they had decertified USAPA and that they had formed a new - new union to void the jury's verdict and that they were requesting the judge to assign a blue ribbon panel to review the clear bias of the jurors and asked that sky god Sully be assigned as the chairman of the committee. They also requested that the committee be called the "Integrity Search Committee".

:laugh: - hey wait, don't give them any ideas!!!

 

[vetrider]

Usapa already put a news release out that says the ninth circuit and supreme courts are the true places to vet the law.

They still don't get it, not that they ever will.

 

[TWA Dude]

When does th thread start concerning the appeal

Our favorite USAPA apologist speaks again. Within a week Judge Wake will issue his remedy injunction. Guess who decides whether to stay that injunction pending appeal? Judge Wake. In other words, the injuction will stick while Seham continues to bill hundreds of hours of useless legal work. The appeal will either not be heard or will go nowhere. Guaranteed.

You should find some other group of malcontents to apologize for.

 

[Tweaker]

The judge decides whether Usapa gets a stay? If it is true, that the effects will be felt immediately, as in not awaiting an appeal, this will all be a bad memory soon.

 

[denny]

and the remedy?

back to seperate votes or something stronger than that?

It will probably be next week before the judge issues remedies. However, the plaintiffs asked for 4 remedies. During discussion of those the judge seemed amenable to the one requiring that the Nicolau arbitrated list be the only list in any negotiated and proposed contract. He also was leaning towards single group ratification rather than east/west group ratification.

Whatever else there may be it seems clear that USAPA will not be allowed to negotiate nor present a tentative agreement that does not include the arbitration award as part of the negotiated agreement. Plaintiffs also asked for implementation of the arbitrated seniority list by a date certain in the event USAPA stalls or does not negotiate for a new contract including the Nic.

 

[abefly]

It will probably be next week before the judge issues remedies. However, the plaintiffs asked for 4 remedies. During discussion of those the judge seemed amenable to the one requiring that the Nicolau arbitrated list be the only list in any negotiated and proposed contract. He also was leaning towards single group ratification rather than east/west group ratification.

Whatever else there may be it seems clear that USAPA will not be allowed to negotiate nor present a tentative agreement that does not include the arbitration award as part of the negotiated agreement. Plaintiffs also asked for implementation of the arbitrated seniority list by a date certain in the event USAPA stalls or does not negotiate for a new contract including the Nic.[/QUOTE]

While I wish this was true it was not brought up in court today.