Quick Facts #8 Hosted on Unbiased Facts
June 22, 2009
US Airways Calls for Consolidation
US Airways’ Next Merger – what can the pilots expect?
US Airways CEO still interested in airline deals
Source:
http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/06/us_airways_ceo_still_interes
te.php
US Airways Calls for Consolidation
Source:
http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/story/10511980/1/us-airways-calls-for-
consolidation.html?cm_ven=YAHOO&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA
US Airways CEO calls for more consolidation
Source:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/US-Airways-CEO-calls-for-more-apf-
15490603.html?.v=2
Doug Parker speaks to Consolidation and Industry Fragmentation, too many hubs,
and not enough passengers for companies to be profitable
Source:
http://www.usairways.com/awa/content/aboutus/investorrelations/webcast.aspx
USAPA Frequently Asked Questions (Prior to the NMB Representation Election)
Question – “What merger protection will we have after USAPA is elected?”
Answer – “A high priority during negotiations with the Company will be the
renegotiation of contractual protections in the event of a merger; such provisions
are binding upon the Company. However, prior to successful negotiation of said
provisions, merger seniority integration would be governed by Sections 2, 3 and 13
of the Allegheny-Mohawk Labor Protective Provisions. This is also guaranteed
under the provisions of a new law signed by President Bush, H.R. 2764. ALPA
merger policy will no longer be applicable, since that policy is restricted in its
application to mergers between two ALPA-represented carriers.”
Source:
http://1.usairlinepilots.org/members-only/old_files/faq.htm
Seniority Merger Legislation (H.R. 2764, SEC. 117. Labor Integration - Omnibus
Budget Bill)
H.R. 2764 was adopted by Congress after to provide a “floor” or minimum
protection for seniority. Prior to this law there was no legal protection for seniority,
which led to unfair results – like thousands of senior TWA flight attendants being
stapled to the bottom of the seniority list at American.
If both work groups in a merger are represented by the same union, the law
explicitly recognizes that the union’s merger policy has jurisdiction. If both groups
are not in the same union, or if both groups are unrepresented at the time of the
merger, then the minimum protections of the new law kick in, and seniority would
be integrated on the basis of a “fair and equitable” standard.
H.R. 2764 is based on Sections 3 and 13 of the Allegheny-Mohawk Labor
Protective Provisions (LPPs). It doesn’t guarantee date-of-hire protection, but it
does provide for final and binding arbitration if the two groups cannot agree on
how to integrate the seniority lists. An arbitrator, independent of the company or
the union, is selected from a list provided by the National Mediation Board and
hears both sides of the seniority integration case.
Source:
http://www.nwaafa.org/docs/QA4.pdf/
Source:
http://www.locallodge141.com/articles/legislative/McCaskill-Bond Bill.html
Source:
http://michiganmachinists.com/news.html
USAPA Constitution & By-Laws - Merger Dues Increase? More USAPA FPL?
USAPA C&BL 5(f) - For expenses related to a proposed merger or acquisition, the
BPR is authorized to increase dues by ½% of qualifying income.
Summary - The USAPA experiment continues. Recent Federal Law doesn't
recognize USAPA's DOH mandate, far from it, it's recognizes "Fair and Equitable"
as determined by an arbitrator (sound familiar?). A seniority integration arbitration
case brought before an arbitrator with a DOH mandate like USAPA's could blow
up in the face of the US Airways pilots just like it did before arbitrator Nicolau -
who also arbitrated under a "Fair and Equitable" standard. Can the US Airways
pilots stand to suffer yet another disasterous outcome? Is USAPA so arrogant that
they can't recognize the risk they put all US Airways pilots in with their DOH
"mandate" that doesn't work in a "Fair and Equitable" world? We will continue to
learn painful lessons until we find a smarter way. Under USAPA, the hope of using
a make-believe argument that the seniority list is "a creature of the contract" was
put to death in an Federal court in Arizona. It might be time for some self-
assessment on how many more losses we want to suffer by buying into USAPA's
dead-end strategies.
June 22, 2009
US Airways Calls for Consolidation
US Airways’ Next Merger – what can the pilots expect?
US Airways CEO still interested in airline deals
Source:
http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/06/us_airways_ceo_still_interes
te.php
US Airways Calls for Consolidation
Source:
http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/story/10511980/1/us-airways-calls-for-
consolidation.html?cm_ven=YAHOO&cm_cat=FREE&cm_ite=NA
US Airways CEO calls for more consolidation
Source:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/US-Airways-CEO-calls-for-more-apf-
15490603.html?.v=2
Doug Parker speaks to Consolidation and Industry Fragmentation, too many hubs,
and not enough passengers for companies to be profitable
Source:
http://www.usairways.com/awa/content/aboutus/investorrelations/webcast.aspx
USAPA Frequently Asked Questions (Prior to the NMB Representation Election)
Question – “What merger protection will we have after USAPA is elected?”
Answer – “A high priority during negotiations with the Company will be the
renegotiation of contractual protections in the event of a merger; such provisions
are binding upon the Company. However, prior to successful negotiation of said
provisions, merger seniority integration would be governed by Sections 2, 3 and 13
of the Allegheny-Mohawk Labor Protective Provisions. This is also guaranteed
under the provisions of a new law signed by President Bush, H.R. 2764. ALPA
merger policy will no longer be applicable, since that policy is restricted in its
application to mergers between two ALPA-represented carriers.”
Source:
http://1.usairlinepilots.org/members-only/old_files/faq.htm
Seniority Merger Legislation (H.R. 2764, SEC. 117. Labor Integration - Omnibus
Budget Bill)
H.R. 2764 was adopted by Congress after to provide a “floor” or minimum
protection for seniority. Prior to this law there was no legal protection for seniority,
which led to unfair results – like thousands of senior TWA flight attendants being
stapled to the bottom of the seniority list at American.
If both work groups in a merger are represented by the same union, the law
explicitly recognizes that the union’s merger policy has jurisdiction. If both groups
are not in the same union, or if both groups are unrepresented at the time of the
merger, then the minimum protections of the new law kick in, and seniority would
be integrated on the basis of a “fair and equitable” standard.
H.R. 2764 is based on Sections 3 and 13 of the Allegheny-Mohawk Labor
Protective Provisions (LPPs). It doesn’t guarantee date-of-hire protection, but it
does provide for final and binding arbitration if the two groups cannot agree on
how to integrate the seniority lists. An arbitrator, independent of the company or
the union, is selected from a list provided by the National Mediation Board and
hears both sides of the seniority integration case.
Source:
http://www.nwaafa.org/docs/QA4.pdf/
Source:
http://www.locallodge141.com/articles/legislative/McCaskill-Bond Bill.html
Source:
http://michiganmachinists.com/news.html
USAPA Constitution & By-Laws - Merger Dues Increase? More USAPA FPL?
USAPA C&BL 5(f) - For expenses related to a proposed merger or acquisition, the
BPR is authorized to increase dues by ½% of qualifying income.
Summary - The USAPA experiment continues. Recent Federal Law doesn't
recognize USAPA's DOH mandate, far from it, it's recognizes "Fair and Equitable"
as determined by an arbitrator (sound familiar?). A seniority integration arbitration
case brought before an arbitrator with a DOH mandate like USAPA's could blow
up in the face of the US Airways pilots just like it did before arbitrator Nicolau -
who also arbitrated under a "Fair and Equitable" standard. Can the US Airways
pilots stand to suffer yet another disasterous outcome? Is USAPA so arrogant that
they can't recognize the risk they put all US Airways pilots in with their DOH
"mandate" that doesn't work in a "Fair and Equitable" world? We will continue to
learn painful lessons until we find a smarter way. Under USAPA, the hope of using
a make-believe argument that the seniority list is "a creature of the contract" was
put to death in an Federal court in Arizona. It might be time for some self-
assessment on how many more losses we want to suffer by buying into USAPA's
dead-end strategies.