Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

USA 3000 fold too?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GFunk20
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 14

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Sun Country has a history of seasonal furloughs. They just haven't done it in about 3 years.

And that makes it a) a rational business model and 2) defensible?

Seasonal pilots kinda like holiday box throwers at FedEx or Christmas belt cinchers at the Gap? We are talking about a profession responsible for the safe passage of gajillions of people each year, right?

Who in their right mind would want to work at an "airline" that has "seasonal furloughs", much less fly on one?

Wait a minute, I get it -- my child's summer vacation is just the result of a "seasonal furlough". It all makes perfect sense now.
 
And that makes it a) a rational business model and 2) defensible?


I am not defending the practice. I am just telling you what they do and they aren't the only carrier that does that either.

Who in their right mind would want to work at an "airline" that has "seasonal furloughs", much less fly on one?


That is part of the reason I didn't accept a job there back in '99. Alot of people in the MSP area fly Sun Country every year.

 
The economic case for USA3000 simply doesn't exist anymore, nor does it for MOST of the charter carriers now, and that is what we are seeing in the market place.

In 2000 When USA3000 was dreamed up, Apple had a lot of trouble getting its pax to places like La Romana and Punta Cana and various places in Mexico.

They used to hire a lot of contract carriers to do that flying for them (think Ryan and Transmeridian) The large network carriers basically shunned that sort of flying.

When I was based in NY for USA3000 I thought we were losing the flying to North American, but I was quite wrong. The flying out of Kennedy was lost to American Airlines, and Newark was lost to continental airlines.

American sends 267 seat A300s to punta Cana and cancun at 900 am on Sat and Sun (switiching to 757s and 737s for the summer when the demand slows down). Everyone was getting off the plane with Apple bag tags. (I just flew that trip 2 weeks ago)

Continental does similar things out of Newark now.

Those services did not exist before about 2004 when the domestic carriers started redeploying their fleets into the carribean.

And I hate to admit it, but the passengers prefer flying on American. 3 simple reasons. first it leaves at a more "civilized" time of day (later show on first day of vacation, leave hotel at more reasonable hour on last day). 2nd (and this is actually much more important thanf anyone realizes) frequent flyer miles. It doesn't matter if the actual service on the aircraft is crap, that is actually the least important part of the travel experience. 3rd And Last, Apple has a wide range of resorts including "Upscale". If you can afford to stay at the Riu Palace at retail prices you would probably be able to afford first class and would infact WANT to pay for it. AA has first class, USA3000 doesn't.

Back in my Ryan days one contract we had went from Cincinati to Brussles with an A320 with 56 seats in it for proctor and gamble and GE. You know what? We lost that service back to delta. The execs would rather fly coach with a "chance" of upgrade from Cincinati to Atlanta to Amsterdamn to brussles at inconvienient times so that they could collect the frequent flier miles than have a personally scheduled private jet with all first class service that had no frequent flier miles. It boggled the mind.

And Apple has the same problem when they charter pax aircraft. Instead they can just block buy seats on AA, UA, CO, NW etc, at what is now a competitive rate AND the pax get frequent flier miles (or in somecases use credit card miles to partially offset the price of the vacation).

BTW I was saying this all the way back in 2004 as soon as I saw how the majors were realigning their fleets. The age of the charter carrier was now in decline. Sadly I was right.

USA3000 could never afford to fly their aircraft in a pax friendly scheduling manner. They HAVE to get 2 turns a day out of them to pay the mortgage which runs whether the plane flies or not. So the early trip will be too early and the late trip will be 2 late.

The Majors on the other hand fly their fleets hard on the weekdays and not so much on the weekend and can use their spare aircraft for 1 turn on Sat and 1 turn on Sunday that will leave at a better hour.

USA3000 Might do better with OLDER less fuel efficient aircraft that had no mortgage, because then you could afford to fly them each only a couple of turns per week, and they wouldn't cost you any money while they are sitting on the ground (think allegiant)

Cheers
Wino

PS my prediction for the next base to close is Philly as more flying is shifted to USAir. Angus built that airline on the basis that USAir was going out of business and that aint happening anytime soon
 
Last edited:
I sure hope no one else fails...

But that was very informative and insightful info that you just provided Wino concerning charter flying... it's nice to be able to read thoughtful stuff like this on FI...

Thanks
 
Does anyone remember Trans Mediterrian or Meridian Airways. There business model was doing contract work for vacation companies, and they just folded in the middle of the night a couple of years back.
 
You mean Transmeridan. They where owned by Pegasus Aircraft Leasing. If I remember correctly, they decided to start using some of the aircraft sitting around that weren't currently on a lease. I know there are at least 2 TMI guys here, they can give a better explanation.
 
Maybe a certain portion of the charter business is in a downturn, but other segments are way up. For instance,long haul charters, subservices, etc.. We constantly are turning down charters because we dont have enough planes.
 
By looking at your logo (North American) what you say may be true, but I suspect it has a lot more to do with you poaching from within your parent company than real outside business (otherwise ATA would not have shut down)

But yes, there is a lot of long haul at the moment. A police action (Iraq and afghanistan) will do that for you. When those two conflicts wind down, so will a lot of the long haul flying.


Cheers
Wino
 
While not to disagree with Wino, there are a couple of other issues missed.

First, during the bankruptcy years of 2002-2006, United and USAirways gave major discounts to Apple Vacations in order to secure income. Remember they also sold seats to the general public at super cheap rates during this time as well. Word is those super discounts are now disappearing

The second factor is the "bargaining chip" factor. By having their own airline, Apple is able to use that as a bargaining chip when negotiating ticket prices with other airlines. I don't know for sure, but word around the company is that in that respect alone USA 3000 has been financially beneficial to the Apple group even if the airline doesn't make a profit operationally.

Again this isn't to disagree with Wino, simply pointing out a couple of other factors.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom