tomgoodman
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2006
- Posts
- 2,356
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Regardless of what happens, everyone KNOWS the East guys are a bunch of BABIES. Don't sign up for binding arbitration if you don't intend to follow the judgement. Cry baby arseholes!
Bye Bye---General Lee
First off, I don't work for US Airways. LOA 93 expired December 31, 2009. The company has chosen to ignore this fact and is still paying LOA 93 wages. My understanding is this is going through the grievance process and the company will probably lose eventually. That will bring the wages back up to near Delta wages. I'm guessing the company wants a new contract before that happens. If the company does lose the LOA 93 arbitration before a new contract is signed, it may have to pay back-wages. It also doesn't help the company's cause that it just showed a record profit second quarter.
I think the Court will duck the issue by saying something like:
"Proceed at your own risk. We cannot foresee what kind of list will emerge, let alone what problems such a hypothetical list might cause, until it is actually approved."
Most of the tripe you post isn't worth the keystrokes to respond but this is just too delicious to ignore. You'd have us believe you'd honor an arbitration if only it met your definition of 'fair'? Well guess what, bubba, the participants in an arbitration don't get to decide if the ruling is fair. Your opinion of the Nic is as worthless as mine.Give us a fair arbitration and we will honor it.
You couldn't be more wrong.
Give us a fair arbitration and we will honor it. We don't submit to corruption and blackmail. Being an ALPA pimp, you probably wouldn't understand
Give us a fair arbitration and we will honor it. We don't submit to corruption and blackmail. Being an ALPA pimp, you probably wouldn't understand
That is an extremely optimistic view of the issue. Yes, LOA93 had an expiration date yet there was no specific mention of a snapback. Generally speaking, when contracts have snapback provisions the language is explicit. I say this without any emotion or animosity: knowing how arbitrators generally side with management I'd say chances are very high the East will lose.My understanding is this is going through the grievance process and the company will probably lose eventually.