Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My non-expert legal opinion is the court is unlikely to release the company from liability. If that becomes the case USAPA's reason for creation will be moot.
I agree! If the courts say the NIC is invalid or they don't have to use it then a whole bunch of old "binding" cases will be reopened. What a mess that would be.
But why does Dogggie want it resolved? He will have to pay more for a new combined contract while now he has cheep labor.
First off, I don't work for US Airways. LOA 93 expired December 31, 2009. The company has chosen to ignore this fact and is still paying LOA 93 wages. My understanding is this is going through the grievance process and the company will probably lose eventually. That will bring the wages back up to near Delta wages. I'm guessing the company wants a new contract before that happens. If the company does lose the LOA 93 arbitration before a new contract is signed, it may have to pay back-wages. It also doesn't help the company's cause that it just showed a record profit second quarter.