Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

UPT Bases

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Any legitimate reason? I can't help but see possible bias with the avitar.
 
Patmack18 said:
Stay away from Mississippi... stay far far away....

Hey, I liked Columbus. Any place with a Pizza Hut, a Malco Theater, and a women's college can't be half bad. :)


(OK, so there were a coupla guys that bullied their way into the women's college, errr, I'm sorry, university, and kinda ruined the idea of a Women's University. But still, the ratios are in your favor... I've heard the library at University of Alabama is a good place to study on weekends, too. :) (No, I didn't - - I just heard.))
 
the T-6 is going to have you much better prepared to make the glass cockpit transition to either T-1's or the T-38C for advanced

Sure, go fly the T-6 to "better prepare you", then you'll wind up in a C-130E with WWII-era avionics!

No, really, don't worry about the whole "glass cockpit" thing. I flew the Tweet then went to the T-1 (I guess there must be something wrong with me too RJP!), and I had no problems learning the new layout. Just a different way to look at things. You'll figure it out.

In any case, I had a love/hate relationship with the Tweet. It's a fun airplane, even if it's not the hot rod the T-6 is. And I felt a bit nostalgic flying something that every Air Force pilot since the 1950s trained in.

On the other hand, it's hot in the cockpit during the summer months...and I think that led to many folks getting sick. Sure the G's are new to a student pilot, but I believe most students could handle the G's much better if they weren't dehydrated and sitting in a 110 degree cockpit.

And while you do have some leverage in which UPT base you'll go to, once you get there, if that base has split T-6/T-37 flights, you won't have any control over which airframe you get. It all depends on timing.

At Laughlin, for a while they had a T-6 squadron and a T-37 squadron, and classes alternated between the two. So if you show up and the next class is scheduled to be a T-6 class...well, then you're flying the mighty Texan II.
 
Ah, Tony and Huey,

Just the responses I'd expect from guys that never flew single-seat and instead got helos and tankers. Whatever. Used to be that guys worked their asses off to get to SPS to get a fighter. Times have changed and now they seem to be more worried about cool glass cockpits and what the Columbus, MS nightlife is like.

Bottom line. Be happy you GET to UPT.
 
Columbus

You should try to go to Columbus if you really want to fly the Tweet. I wanted to fly the Tweet while I was at the zoo, but believe me you'd be better off flying the T-6. The Tweet was fun to fly during the formation phase, but otherwise it's a gas guzzling noise maker.

USAFA C/O 2003
Columbus SUPT 05-02
 
Although I cant read his thoughts, I think RJP was just reliving in his mind the fun he had at Sheppard. As an ENJJPT grad and an ENJJPT IP, you can tell from my picture that the glorious drawdown of the early 90's changed my career path just a bit. No worries, though. I love FRED and the life it has given me.
Back to the issue at hand, I had an AWESOME time at ENJJPT because the the European contingent (they outnumber the Yanks) just wouldn't put up with some of the BS Air Force rules. I remember when the ASEV struck and they looked at our programs. They asked "Why aren't you complying with such and such" We would just show them the front of the regulation that said the ENJJPT Steering Committee took presidence. It was a beautiful thing. We didn't trip-turn students, our cross counties left on Friday and flew back on Sunday. We didn't fly on Saturday, so partying/skiing was on the menu.
Regardless of the location you choose or gets chosen for you, have a ball. You will never work so hard or have as much fun and camaderie (sp) as your year at pilot training. Enjoy!
BTW, did they really get rid of the Form O-96??? Fast neat average...
 
BTW, did they really get rid of the Form O-96???

Yeah, for the most part. Every once in a while, they magically appear on the tables. The Air Force is trying to kill the old days and doing a pretty good job of it. Our class painting has Bring Me Men on it. Because of that, they will not allow it on base one those words are painted on. In order for it to be accepted by the academy, they need to make a digital copy, take out the BMM, and put in the new stuff. 05 was cheated out of a lot of stuff 04 and before did, but for the most part, it was still a four degree year. After 06, its gone and no one will remember what it was like. Sad really.

I know that was off topic. Thanks again for the help.
 
RJP said:
Ah, Tony and Huey,

Just the responses I'd expect from guys that never flew single-seat and instead got helos and tankers. Whatever.

RJP,

Did you ever consider Huey passed on the chance to fly 38s like many others? And by the way he flew helos prior to joining the AF not as a result of a UPT assignment.

Wondering if you knew some guys graduated fourth in their class of 25 and "got" a tanker in 1993 while other folks graduated ninth out of 12 in 1996 and "got" an F-16. Whatever folks "got" particulary between 1991 and 1995 during the drawdown of the AF was often a result of what MPC had a surplus of training of at the time. The guy who graduated fourth in his class "choose" a tanker over a desk or a banked fighter, and yes their are plenty of ENJJPT grads who "got" tankers in 1995 since MPC was handed them out like candy at Halloween....six of them were in my class at Altus in the summer of 1995. Then the wave starting shifting back to what seemed to be "normal".

And did you ever consider some folks passed on fighters for humanitarian reasons like a family member with a medical problem while their son or daughter was in UPT? My dad got cancer three days into UPT. I graduated UPT, and my dad passed away three weeks later, just two days after I got to Robins AFB...a 45 min drive from my parent's and a bittersweet homecoming. Did I want a KC-135 first choice...no, but I'll take my tanker to Robins to be near my family in a time like this any day over the choice to fly a single seat anything just to feel good that I'm a fighter pilot. And no, I didn't pass on a fighter, but plenty of my friends in my UPT class did. I wonder if my experience might have been different had I been strong enough not to think about my dad during UPT and graduated higher in my class and gone to Luke instead. ??? I'm glad I'll never know the answer and therefore don't think about it.

Merlin05,

First of all congrats on getting the chance to go to UPT.

My .02, fly the T-38 if you have the chance and think you might want to fly a fighter as you can always switch to heavies later in life. The 38 is a blast to fly, and you will never get the chance to go from heavies to fighters if you choose that path. But if you ever have to make a choice between family or a cockpit, I'd choose family any day. Accordingly, if I were in your shoes, I'd pick Vance since you have family nearby...you never know if you'll be stationed near them anytime again, and you still may get the chance to fly the 37.

Don't pick a T-37,T-6, T-38, T-1, or T-44 because someone told you to do so. Ask other folks what they think about flying their KC-X, F-X, C-X or, T-X and choose your own path.

Yahtz
 
Last edited:
What's for me is not for you

Just to set the record straight, I did indeed fly Hueys in the Army...and you don't "get" helos in the Army...that's all there is. I flew for the Army not out of desperation but because of family tradition. My father flew AH-1 Cobras, UH-1s and OH-58s and my grandfather flew Army fixed-wing and UH-1s. I don't know of too many other families who had three generations that flew the same model of aircraft (UH-1H).

Having lived around Army posts my whole life I got familiar with another aircraft...the C-130. They were common over most Army installations and I always thought it would be cool to fly one. Now I am flying Herks and I love the airplane.

And my track select "wish list" looked something like this:

T-1
T-44
T-38
UH-1

UH-1 was last simply because I had already "been there, done that" and didn't feel like going back through the entire helicopter training syllabus again.

Sorry, I just never had the urge to be a fighter pilot. Sure, I'd love to go take a Viper for a spin, but as for the job itself? No thanks. As a kid I wanted to fly fighters, but as I got older I realized there's a difference between flying fighters and being a fighter pilot.

Not digging on anyone who wants that career path...just stop digging on my choices.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top