Please let me clarify
Originally posted by OPIE01:
I just looked at those gouge sites posted earlier by Yahtzee. Yahtzee can't be right in his saying:
Opie,
I appreciate your inputs and just want to clarify my original post about websites such as
www.uptprep.com.
First, I should have never type that post without drinking a cup of coffee to make sure I was functional first.

I was wrong to refer to the gouge as a “spoiled” part of the website. There is a time and place for gouge, and many students simply do not know what or how to study in UPT. They have to be taught what and how to study.
Second, if I thought the site was that bad, I would have never recommended to any future student. In fact, I give my students this site. But, I give it to them with instructions of how to use it.
Third, I didn’t say students who have gouge struggle, I wrote
There are many students who just study the gouge, and they struggle in UPT. UPT is tough, and no amount of gouge can replace a good work effort that is focused.
Please read this sentence again...“There are many students who just study the gouge, and they struggle in UPT.”
I stand by this comment unwavering. I have been a T-1 IP for over three years, and made this comment in reference to students who can get 100s on every EPQ, but that can’t tell me or any other IP how to perform basic procedural maneuvers throughout the program.
There are many types of gouge: Answers to tests, quick reference sheets, nice to know numbers, clarification of poorly worded USAF manuals / instructions. I didn’t communicate my thoughts with my earlier post effectively. When I spoke of “spoiled” gouge, I meant the answers to EPQs, which by the way count a whopping 5% toward the students overall performance. I do believe it is for more important to study the manual that instructs how to do a normal takeoff, a go-around, a circle, or a straight and level practice lost wingman, etc.
What I don’t understand is the lack of effort some students put forth in UPT. Maybe it’s because the USAF allows unlimited 89 rides (elimination rides for you those of you who don’t understand the lingo). With pressure to graduate students from above, some lazy people take advantage of this situation. One student in our squadron went to seven 89s rides, before the squadron commander finally understood this student had no business in a cockpit. It is my opinion that approx 15% of T-1 students simply give the minimum level of effort and only study gouge, and rarely crack the Dash One, 11-203, or chair-fly. Last year, I told one student "I will wipe the smeared food off your face into your mouth, but I will not spoon feed you like a helpless infant." The student struggled not because he wasn't capable, but because he gave sub par effort for the first five months of the program. The last six weeks he finally blossomed. He studied, and showed remarkable improvement over his previous performance. At his graduation, he bought me a drink, and thanked me for trying to help him get his crap together. He admitted he didn't try for the longest time. I wasn't angry at him, just frustrated and disappointed that he could have gotten so much more out of the program, had he simply tried earlier.
Opie, I agree with your comments about teamwork, and sharing information with your fellow classmates. I have and continue to use gouge, I am not holier than you or anyone else, and never intended to imply I was. If my post was taken as such, I apologize. I think at this point in my life, I understand how to use gouge. Some students discover gouge and forget it is only a tool to focus their studying, not a substitute for focused effort. That is where the Instructor comes into to play. I was voted “Best IP” by the students in the first class I ever taught. It had nothing to do with my instructional ability, because I still had to learn how to become an Instructor. PIT only got me qualified in the T-1. At the graduation the night I learned I was the voted the “Best IP” for this class, the SRO told me it was unanimous decision. I didn’t even fly with four of the students. What he told me I did do was this: "You teach, and do not haze. You care and it shows." I have tried to remember to listen, to understand what it is like to be a student, and to think what I would want from my IP if I were the student. Students have taught me as much as I have taught them...maybe I have taught them more about flying, but they have taught me what works and what doesn't in the teaching business. Learning isn't a one way street.
Opie, I think we are trying to do the same thing: help others. Sometimes IPs just have different methods or opinions on how to do that. Sound like having different techniques. I know I did a poor job of communicating my thoughts earlier. I'll work to improve this. Best wishes at SWA!
To all the future studs out there: Good luck, use gouge, but learn how to use it, and what's important. Learn to prioritize your tasks.
I hope this explanation helps. Hey, after all, I've had my daily cup of coffee.
