Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

UPS buying Polar again!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
FearlessFreep said:
I could say that it would be safe to assume that all the pilots at Polar are more than fully aware of the ramifications of a takeover by UPS. Reiterating those facts ad nausem is totally unneccessary and serves no real purpose other than to make yourself and you compatriots feel superior to the rest of us. I still find your unctuous attitude with the lightly applied veil of your "good intentions" to be reprehensible.

You truly are a brown shirt - with all the implications of that being fufilled. I guess that fits with your nom de guerre. As in name, as in nature.

It will be really interesting to see how your union's contract negotiations will pan out with all the hard concessions the passenger carrying legacy carriers have had deal with. Sort of definitely lowers the bar on pilots pay across the board. Too bad for all of us. Do you think you guys will prevail?

Cheers & Good Luck To Us All!

I am truly sorry that you feel this way about me. I do not feel "superior" to anyone or any other pilot group. I am just trying to relay the overwhelming sentiment of the UPS pilots that IF a buyout of Polar occurs there will be NO merging of lists in any way. This is a dog eat dog world and the IPA will take care of it's own first. You can also gain insight as to what may happen if the purchase happens with what UPS did with the purchase of Challenge.

Now as to the contract, we have two weeks of negotiations starting later this month and I'm personally cautiously optimistic that real progress will be made. The passenger contracts do not factor in at all to our talks. UPS makes approx. 1 BILLION dollars a QUARTER in PROFIT. International volume is growing like crazy and they still haven't invented an amphibious package car, so that means lots more growth for the airline. I personally am looking to see somewhere around an upper 30 to 40% pay raise along with substantial gains in the remaining areas. That would put a 12 yr captain around $260K a year min guarantee and a 4-5 yr F/O around the mid $130K min guarantee.
 
AHH... Don't mean to bust your bubble FREIGHTNAZI, but PAC does have a merger policy in its ALPA wa. You cannot simply march on the property and "RAPE" the pilot group as you did to Challenge... We will fight for a fair and equitable integration...I suspect this is a sticky point and one of the reasons UPS has not acquired POLAR yet..
 
B-atch said:
AHH... Don't mean to bust your bubble FREIGHTNAZI, but PAC does have a merger policy in its ALPA wa. You cannot simply march on the property and "RAPE" the pilot group as you did to Challenge... We will fight for a fair and equitable integration...I suspect this is a sticky point and one of the reasons UPS has not acquired POLAR yet..

One "minor" problem with your theory, the UPS pilots are NOT alpa! Look what happened to the alpa TWA pilots when non alpa AA bought them. If UPS buys Polar, look for UPS to cherry pick what it wants ( 400s and int'l route authority ) and either not buy the rest or $hitcan it.
 
FreightNazi said:
One "minor" problem with your theory, the UPS pilots are NOT alpa! Look what happened to the alpa TWA pilots when non alpa AA bought them. If UPS buys Polar, look for UPS to cherry pick what it wants ( 400s and int'l route authority ) and either not buy the rest or $hitcan it.

Agreed, agreed....and agreed.

Right, wrong or otherwise that is what will happen. If I were at Polar I would be preparing for this "fact" and not hiding behind the ALPA merger language in your CBA and hoping for the best.
 
FreightNazi said:
One "minor" problem with your theory, the UPS pilots are NOT alpa! Look what happened to the alpa TWA pilots when non alpa AA bought them. If UPS buys Polar, look for UPS to cherry pick what it wants ( 400s and int'l route authority ) and either not buy the rest or $hitcan it.

Cherry Pick??? Hahahahaha! Good One Frieght Nazi!!!!! Jeez talk about believing your own press!!! Hahahahah!!!!!
 
So, we start with this pointed and IMHO correct observation:
FearlessFreep said:
You (FreightNazi) seem resolute in finding some kind of perverse joy in the potential of a number of people possibly losing their jobs to the brown juggernaut.
To which he helpfully replies:
FreightNazi said:
I am truly sorry that you feel this way about me. I do not feel "superior" to anyone or any other pilot group.
And a few posts later:
FreightNazi said:
If we buy you, we'll see who's laughing at the end! The smart bet is that the Polar pilots won't be the one's laughing!
Nazi, are you still confused as to why more than one person thinks you are completely disingenuous in your assertion that you don't take joy in other people possibly losing work because of Brown?
 
FreightNazi said:
If we buy you, we'll see who's laughing at the end! The smart bet is that the Polar pilots won't be the one's laughing!

IF....IF...IF.....It might help if you base your arguments on fact not fantasy from now on.:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
"One "minor" problem with your theory, the UPS pilots are NOT alpa! Look what happened to the alpa TWA pilots when non alpa AA bought them. If UPS buys Polar, look for UPS to cherry pick what it wants ( 400s and int'l route authority ) and either not buy the rest or $hitcan it."

W/out making any assertions I believe the courts, (no, i cannot quote any case law), have ruled that the pilots at an airline that is being bought have a right to fly the routes the airline used to fly.

Where things get tricky is how many pilots are actually needed to fly the routes. Generally, it has been much less than the pilots at the airline. Basically the reserves are not needed. So, some Polar pilots could be let go, but if brown elected to shaft all the polar pilots it would probably lead to a law suit.

Personally, I think it is a rumor and is not going to happen.

r
 
robert_fla said:
"One "minor" problem with your theory, the UPS pilots are NOT alpa! Look what happened to the alpa TWA pilots when non alpa AA bought them. If UPS buys Polar, look for UPS to cherry pick what it wants ( 400s and int'l route authority ) and either not buy the rest or $hitcan it."

W/out making any assertions I believe the courts, (no, i cannot quote any case law), have ruled that the pilots at an airline that is being bought have a right to fly the routes the airline used to fly.

Where things get tricky is how many pilots are actually needed to fly the routes. Generally, it has been much less than the pilots at the airline. Basically the reserves are not needed. So, some Polar pilots could be let go, but if brown elected to shaft all the polar pilots it would probably lead to a law suit.

Personally, I think it is a rumor and is not going to happen.

r

I agree. One thing I've learned about Brown over the years is this: they are the best in the business about keeping a secret. There has been NO official announcement by the company with regards to purchasing anybody. With that said and the fact that this rumor is the current topic of conversation here, I wouldn't place any faith into it. If I were a betting man, I would bet that this is simply just a rumor, nothing more nothing less.

There is one more thing I've learned about Brown also. They don't just let anybody work here. They might offer interviews, but in the end if you want to work here, you have to interview, get hired, and start at the bottom just like everybody else. If one is a captain somewhere else and the thought of being "stapled" and possibly starting as an FE makes you sick, then please feel free to stand in line at the unemployment office. A former senior captain elsewhere turned junior FE at Brown is a lot better than a former captain turned unemployment receipient.

I've read the posts about ALPA and all of the "musts" that UPS would supposedly have to abide by. Well, there's good reason why ALPA's rules wouldn't work in the hypothetical case of a buyout of Polar.

First, two seperate unions. ALPA has no say as to how it's members would be integrated into a private pilot union.

Second, this isn't one airline purchasing another. This is a giant transportation conglomerate purchasing the assets of a much smaller cargo airline. i.e., ALPA cannot say how it's pilots would be merged with regards to seniority at a trucking company. Remember, the airline is only part of UPS, not the other way around.

Third, UAL, USAirways and pensions. If ALPA were as strong as it claims to be, the union would have been able to do a lot more for it's members than what we have been witnessing. They can't even take care of issues with it's carriers, what makes anyone think they are going to be able to force a multi-billion dollar transportation conglomerate to deal on ALPA's terms?

Finally, there is talk on here about route authority and aquisition. Pesonally, I don't think Brown is as interested in the routes as much as they are in acquiring airframes. True, the routes would then be up for another bid, and Brown could possibly win them back by proving that they have the airframes and personnel to successfully operate them. This last part is pure speculation.

Again, I think this UPS-Polar thing is just a rumor. I've heard so many "based on a good reliable source" rumors since I've been here, and everytime the big announcement happened it was totally different than everyone thought.

A good rule of thumb is this: if you know about it before Big Brown says something, it isn't going to happen.
 
o

"One "minor" problem with your theory, the UPS pilots are NOT alpa! Look what happened to the alpa TWA pilots when non alpa AA bought them."

Had nothing to do with the fact AA was not ALPA, had to do with the fact that TWA gave up their scope clause in bankruptcy court. It bit them in the end. If Polar has a scope they may not have to be stapled or booted to the street. ( FYI, the court presedence is the Allegeny-Mohawk agreement which prevents stapling.) Big if, UPS did'nt become who they are by not knowing how to side step around problems.

That being said, it does not matter, I don't agree with whats his names attitude, but that does not matter either. It is a fact of life, there will always be people out there like that. Beside who ever said it has a valid point, I would rather be at the bottom of of the UPS list with a future than at the top of list of a company that treats you like crap. At least at UPS you get compensated well for being treated like crap.

The IPA is strong and that is a good model for us all, UNITY. ALPA should take notes. We need a good old fashion SOS, but the boys at ALPA are a bunch of sell outs. I imagine more pensions will be dropped shortly and contracts may be cancelled, and that should scare us all.

Rots of ruck.
 
Last edited:
Notice how the UPS posts are cool, calm and collective and the Polar guys are freaking out about this subject??

Na, just another rumor.
 
:):):) I love the "Big Announcement at the end of the month" ...... how many times have we heard this one? Seriously guys, why are you even responding to the nazi, let him think he's superior :) Who really cares? Tomorrow is another day, anything can happen, so enjoy it as it comes.
 
sandman2122 said:
Notice how the UPS posts are cool, calm and collective and the Polar guys are freaking out about this subject??

Na, just another rumor.

Were not freaking out, you just wish we were.
 
David and Goliath

I for one always bid on the underdog....If this was a SIMPLE business transaction, I'm sure BIG BAD UPS would have made it's move a LOOONG time ago...Anyhow.... I was loocking for a job when I found this one, soooo......LET THE GAMEs begin!!!!!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom