Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

United, US Airways fly closer to merger (Article - May 11)

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
"PanAm/National, Delta/Western, NWA/Republic, TWA/Ozark, US Air/PSA, US Air/Piedmont, and so on and so on....... All pretty much "DOH, with conditions and restrictions/Fences"

Have you ever asked an Ozark guy how he felt about the TWA/OZ merge? There is still a HUGE amount of bitterness and resentment over that integration, 23 years later. They did NOT get A-M provisions. The TWA pilots threatened to pull out of ALPA if they had to abide by A-M LPP's (sound familiar?). With the help of Carl Icahn, they were able to cram DOH down the throats of the OZ guys. It was essentially a staple job, very similar to the effect that DOH would have today on the America West folks. It's also one of the reasons ALPA changed its merger policy.

Somebody actually paid attention during history class. US Airways and America West is TWA and Ozark all over again.
 
Yeah, seniority is everything.


What DOH do you want to use? First airline, first merger, first ALPA airline? My guess is you want to use whatever benefits you, while telling everyone else it "benefits" the profession.

You fit right in with the usapa idiots.

Yeah I got lots to gain merging with two carriers, One of which has 9 A330 and a hand full of 767's and another that has a base in the desert and 0 widebodies. Maybe I'm missing something clue me in.
 
Yeah I got lots to gain merging with two carriers, One of which has 9 A330 and a hand full of 767's and another that has a base in the desert and 0 widebodies. Maybe I'm missing something clue me in.

Edited...I misread this post

1. Nevermind
2. There are TWO bases in the desert.
 
I tell ya what, a leg home from Minnieapolis in the winter and driving home in your t shirt with your arm hanging out the window looking forward to the rest of your day is awful sweet.
 
Yeah I got lots to gain merging with two carriers, One of which has 9 A330 and a hand full of 767's and another that has a base in the desert and 0 widebodies. Maybe I'm missing something clue me in.

well phoenix and vegas are some of the fastest growing cities in the country. Even considering the current housing crisis when you factor in the massive retirements in the general population they should remain growth cities for a long time to come. lots of people will be flying to see mom and dad over the years...unfortunately us airways in their infinite wisdom seems ready to cede Vegas to Southwest. hopefully it won't be a repeat of PSA giving up the west coast.
 
Right, nice try.

I'm guessing you think it would help you.

Where were the doh people when Eastern, Pan Am, TWA, etc, went under? You going to give the Aloha or ATA guys DOH at NJA?

Well...............

I stand to gain nothing in this conversation or to my career.

NetJets will never be compared to a legacy carrier. Period. We use Part 121 carriers to get to and from jets.

Aloha? ATA? We aren't merging with either companies. Completely incompatible business models that both happen to fly jets. I don't think your question is valid. Pilots from ATA and Aloha can and should apply here. Some may get hired and they will be given a Date Of Hire.

Now, many of you may not even know that we currently do have a merger integration occurring at NetJets right now (NJA/NJI). The difference between our merger and the other ones that have made horrible news in recent years is that we are taking care of our own business in house. No mediation. No arbitration. No front page news articles. No recalls.

DOH ruled. Period. End of story. Easy, simple, predictable.

The seniority issue of DOH never even came up as a negative for NJA/NJI. DOH was the only option to choose to insure that the needs and futures of the GROUP moved forward. Sure, a few individuals might have felt they were shorted but the combined group will be fine.

But maybe you guys have it all figured out with these "career expectation" and "surviving carrier" models.

I sure don't see it but whatever.
 
"Seniority" as you choose to define it is meaningless. DOH , as any kind of standard, does not exist in THIS industry for very good reasons. For example, If I have 20 years "seniority" but have been on furlough for 13 of those SAME years...am I owed something?

Am I owed something from a totally unrelated pilot with 8 years "seniority" that was never furloughed but has a greater length of service?

DOH is DOA because it's meaningless in the airline industry. That's why DOH was removed from ALPA merger policy 17 years ago.

If 2 companies merge? Yes, IMO. DOH.

Each pilot group brought something to the table; some good, some bad... like a family. The family can either move forward with family business or sit around fighting and debating.

Pilots at HP/AAA have been fighting so long over seniority that they must be getting pretty good at it, deserving the title of MasterDebaters.

How much time and money has been literally wasted on the most recent merger? Home much will be wasted in the future?

What was really gained?

P.S. Umm. UAL ALPA changed the merger provision language at the ALPA National so as to protect their collective asses in 2000. UAL/US #1.
 
I stand to gain nothing in this conversation or to my career.

NetJets will never be compared to a legacy carrier. Period. We use Part 121 carriers to get to and from jets.

Aloha? ATA? We aren't merging with either companies. Completely incompatible business models that both happen to fly jets. I don't think your question is valid. Pilots from ATA and Aloha can and should apply here. Some may get hired and they will be given a Date Of Hire.

Now, many of you may not even know that we currently do have a merger integration occurring at NetJets right now (NJA/NJI). The difference between our merger and the other ones that have made horrible news in recent years is that we are taking care of our own business in house. No mediation. No arbitration. No front page news articles. No recalls.

DOH ruled. Period. End of story. Easy, simple, predictable.

The seniority issue of DOH never even came up as a negative for NJA/NJI. DOH was the only option to choose to insure that the needs and futures of the GROUP moved forward. Sure, a few individuals might have felt they were shorted but the combined group will be fine.

But maybe you guys have it all figured out with these "career expectation" and "surviving carrier" models.

I sure don't see it but whatever.

Comparing the merger of pilots at NJA/NJI with AAA/AWA is a huge stretch. NJI is about one eighth of NJA's size. Even if NJI was a much older company(it's not), like AAA is to AWA, you could give them all DOH and nobody would at NJA would even notice. Fact is, NJI is younger and much smaller, so no matter what system you use to merge the two, not a single pilot at NJA (you) will even notice.

Dude, you still spend more time on the majors board than most major pilots.....still got a bit of big jet envy don't ya! Oh I know...Mcdonald's, TSA shakedowns, same airport monotony...blah, blah, blah.....I'M NOT BUYING IT!
 
Funny how the AFA has doesn't have all these problems....could it have something to do with DOH. HMMM
Glad you brought this up. As you well know, the AFA policy is straight DOH. This effectively staples the AWA FA group. The fact that you HAVEN'T heard any problems is because our FAs have accepted their union's policy. The AWA pilots have accepted ALPA's merger policy as well. Need I remind you of who hasn't? These problems you refer to have a source and the policy isn't it -- it's a certain group of pilots with an overblown sense of entitlement.

DOH -- simple doesn't make it right.
 
Comparing the merger of pilots at NJA/NJI with AAA/AWA is a huge stretch. NJI is about one eighth of NJA's size. Even if NJI was a much older company(it's not), like AAA is to AWA, you could give them all DOH and nobody would at NJA would even notice. Fact is, NJI is younger and much smaller, so no matter what system you use to merge the two, not a single pilot at NJA (you) will even notice.

Dude, you still spend more time on the majors board than most major pilots.....still got a bit of big jet envy don't ya! Oh I know...Mcdonald's, TSA shakedowns, same airport monotony...blah, blah, blah.....I'M NOT BUYING IT!

Don't know why. 370 pilots at NJI. 2,800 pilots at NJA. A merger is a merger. I think the stapler could have been proposed... but why go that route?

Personally, I moved about 300 numbers more junior because of the merger. Oh well. I call it a career win because it's a done deal and we can all move on taking care of our Owners and growing.

Big jet envy? Heck no. Steady paychecks do it for me. But let's not make this about me.

Inquiring minds want to know... why wouldn't DOH have worked at HP/AAA? In 10 years, most of the AAA pilots would have been gone and HP would have inherited the airline.

Rhetorical question at this point but going forward, more pilot groups will be faced with the same questions.

I am mesmerized my the choice I see most 121 pilots making; ME above all.
 
Glad you brought this up. As you well know, the AFA policy is straight DOH. This effectively staples the AWA FA group. The fact that you HAVEN'T heard any problems is because our FAs have accepted their union's policy. The AWA pilots have accepted ALPA's merger policy as well. Need I remind you of who hasn't? These problems you refer to have a source and the policy isn't it -- it's a certain group of pilots with an overblown sense of entitlement.

DOH -- simple doesn't make it right.

How would you have done in the TWA/AA merger with DOH?
 
How would you have done in the TWA/AA merger with DOH?

He would have been about 2500 numbers higher on the list and would have completely avoided furlough. Only problem is, even though TWA brought a lot of good things to the table, they did'nt bring enough to justify another 2500 numbers for TWA dude. That would have put him higher on the list, percentage-wise than where he was at TWA. That's why the "Tannen proposal" was presented to the APA. It was an integration methodology that was done very much like Nicolau's award for AWA/AAA. Of course, the APA laughed at it because the TWA guys had no leverage.
 
Funny how the AFA has doesn't have all these problems....could it have something to do with DOH. HMMM


No. its because they are paid the same per flight hour whether they are a Flight Attendant working a trip flying domestic or a widebody trip international. They aren't paid more per flt hr for flying on different aircraft within their airlines fleet as pilots are . They are only paid more for their lengh of time with their company. This is the only reason why DOH works for flight attendants No pay differential for different aircraft types flown.

PHXFLYR:cool:
 
Don't know why. 370 pilots at NJI. 2,800 pilots at NJA. A merger is a merger. I think the stapler could have been proposed... but why go that route?

So, you are opposed to stapling 370 NJI guys to your list, but you're OK with AAA stapling about 1300 AWA guys to their list?

Inquiring minds want to know... why wouldn't DOH have worked at HP/AAA? In 10 years, most of the AAA pilots would have been gone and HP would have inherited the airline.

For starters....It's not ALPA's merger policy. Also, DOH puts too many AWA pilots in harms way if US has to furlough. If a furlough were to occur, the new hires would be the first to go and rightly so, but there aren't many of them. Next to go would be a mix of our new hires that were hired from 2004 to 2005 and AAA 1999 hires. The next batch to get furloughed would be mostly the AWA pilots that were hired after 1990. That would account for all but about the top 1/3 of the AWA pilots. After that, it would be a mix of AWA and AAA guys, but at a pace that favors AAA.

Answer me this:

Our bottom guy at the time of the merger had a few months on the property. Why should he be put in a more precarious position than the guy on the bottom of AAA's list? Remember, before you answer, the old US Airways does not exist. The merger created a new company that goes by LCC on the NYSE.


I am mesmerized my the choice I see most 121 pilots making; ME above all.

After seeing the actions of the US Airways east pilots in the last few months, I am too.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom