Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

UAL-More Furloughs?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
G100,

You're right, as a matter of fact, we should adopt a policy that would foster more airpooling, kinda like carpooling.

Yeah, we should levy massive gas taxes on aircraft that carry less than 100 pax.

What I'm saying there ace, is that you are the biggest gas hog of all per pax. If you really feel this way about the environment, you really need to reevaluate your gluttonous use of fossil fuel.

Oh, but I'm just one of the many ignoramuses on this board that are so much lower than you, oh, wise one. So pontificate away and enlighten us all Ralph.
 
"You're right, as a matter of fact, we should adopt a policy that would foster more airpooling, kinda like carpooling.

Yeah, we should levy massive gas taxes on aircraft that carry less than 100 pax.

What I'm saying there ace, is that you are the biggest gas hog of all per pax. If you really feel this way about the environment, you really need to reevaluate your gluttonous use of fossil fuel."

Well, I must say, you have a point. Not many things as disgusting as a enviromental socialist cruising around in a G-V. FWIW, EVERYBODY (all commercial traffic) should pay a flat fee for airspace use.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom