Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
G4G5 said:UAL bids on FLYi assets
It's like Stevie Wonder bidding on new sun glasses, an absolute waste of time.
Heavy Set said:UAL is clearly being strategic about it - they don't want JetBlue bidding on the gates, etc. That's all UAL needs, a swarm of E190s flooding into IAD with cheap seats and nice IFE...
Heavy Set said:UAL is clearly being strategic about it - they don't want JetBlue bidding on the gates, etc. That's all UAL needs, a swarm of E190s flooding into IAD with cheap seats and nice IFE...
flyin4pennies said:There's no way than anyone could operate E190's out of the A gates. It is hard enough to fit the CRJ in there.
JetBlue would have to tear the gates down and rebuild if they want to use that area.
Andy said:FLYI uses each finger for 4 or 6 (I can't remember which) CRJs. If they went down to 2 E190s per finger, it could be done. Perhaps not optimum, but there's enough room to fit E190s in there. I think that JetBlue would rather have new E190 gates on the far side of the B gates.
flyin4pennies said:There's no way than anyone could operate E190's out of the A gates. It is hard enough to fit the CRJ in there.
JetBlue would have to tear the gates down and rebuild if they want to use that area.
DH2WN said:Those gates were designed to be torn down and re-configured easily. That's why they have long glass fingers which are attached to the ground at certain strategic points. It wouldn't take long for jetBlue to configure them.
Even so, how many E190s could they fit into the terminal that they would replace the current A gates with, and is it worth it? Also I agree with the second part of your post.
Juniority said:I'm sorry, is someone behind the times? Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this December the third aniversary of United's attempt to hide out in bankruptcy long enough for market forces to change in their favor?