Announcement TWA FLIGHT 800 SOLVED

[Aaron Sheets]

You may know about the crash of TWA 800 on July 17, 1996 at 8:32 pm off the coast of Long Island. Since that time, the Internet was and continues to be ablaze with continuing 'debates' about what happened, even 30 years later. I took part in the lawsuit against the Safety Board. We received a most favorable ruling by the Judge. The 747 was not brought down by 'kerosene vapors getting ignited' by a mystery spark. The flight, at just over 15,000 feet, was impacted at the Left wing root by a Target vehicle, which is what initiated the Break-up. The NATO Navy had four warships in the area; two of which were targeting the 'Target missile'. Due to an unfortunate miscalculation, the Target AV hit the planes left side, where moments later, as the plane was falling, Two SAMs, one from a NATO ship to the East of and one NATO ship to the South of TWA, came into play. The missile from the South, [seen by witnesses on the USAir 217 flight] impacted the Left wing, full of fuel, which is what resulted in that "massive fireball" The SAM from the East detonated close by, as to effect the fuselage with shrapnel. This information came by way of my new surface Radar analysis, FOIA documents, and certain court documents. The information is irrevocable, and Bona-fide. I also discovered that the NTSB, deleted 25 seconds of Flight data, and altered the CVR recordings. This as well, is irrevocable. I have written several technical essays which I provided to the plaintiffs for the court, and, have a Draft report, online. I recently completed four companion articles detailing what actually occurred that night showing my work. Most people seem "disappointed" that this thing has finally been solved. I have no apologies for doing so. For those who are truly interested in the only facts, you are invited to listen at [ PlayerFM aaron sheets twa flight 800 solved ] I hope for some constructive replies. If you don't care for my report, then fine. But I would ask for 'civility in any replies', and not a rant, using vulgarity and personal attacks. I have been dealing with that for some time now, and such does not add to the purpose which is to educate and inform. Thank, Aaron