Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Tomcat flys its final mission

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
VVJM265 said:
Weasel Keeper,

I see what you were saying now. Sad to see all these great airplanes being put to bed. At least half a dozen Navy types have gone to rest since I've been in.

What's fun for me, I was at George AFB, CA from 86-90 and we had a squadron of OV-10s and five squadrons of F-4E/Gs. Since then my base closed and the OV-10s and Phantoms have been retired. I'm starting to feel a bit old. :eek:
 
Weasel Keeper said:
What's fun for me, I was at George AFB, CA from 86-90 and we had a squadron of OV-10s and five squadrons of F-4E/Gs. Since then my base closed and the OV-10s and Phantoms have been retired. I'm starting to feel a bit old. :eek:

I know what you mean. When we got orders to Corpus I told my 7 yo that the Lex was there and that I had landed on her in training. Once we finally got here and she saw the old gal tied to the pier, my daughter connected most of the dots and said, "So Dad, the ship you used to land on is a museeeum now!" Out of the mouths of babes......
 
Weasel Keeper said:
What's fun for me, I was at George AFB, CA from 86-90 and we had a squadron of OV-10s and five squadrons of F-4E/Gs. Since then my base closed and the OV-10s and Phantoms have been retired. I'm starting to feel a bit old. :eek:

We should form a support group.
 
Weasel Keeper said:
You're correct. My quote about the "new jet on the block" had to do with the Tomcat. Relatively speaking, the 16 and 18 were more the "new jets on the block" when the Phantoms were being retired. The Tomcats are almost as old as the Phantoms. They are about the same age as the A-10 and F-15...so which is next? :erm:

Yeah, Weasel, but we are talking about F-14D's which were digital machines constructed not that long ago. The "D's" that are flying now are incredibly capable warfighters with LANTIRN, JTIDS, JDAM, IRST, PTID, APG-71, FTI, IR BOL etc etc etc. They are dinosaurs yes, but deadly, highly capable ones. I know, I flew them.
 
Bavarian Chef said:
Yeah, Weasel, but we are talking about F-14D's which were digital machines constructed not that long ago. The "D's" that are flying now are incredibly capable warfighters with LANTIRN, JTIDS, JDAM, IRST, PTID, APG-71, FTI, IR BOL etc etc etc. They are dinosaurs yes, but deadly, highly capable ones. I know, I flew them.

I got to go to the D rollout at Grumman (where is that paperweight?). I've always thought the Navy should have continued to refine that aircraft instead of buying the Hornet E/F.
 
VVJM265 said:
I got to go to the D rollout at Grumman (where is that paperweight?). I've always thought the Navy should have continued to refine that aircraft instead of buying the Hornet E/F.

You can only rebuild a 35 year old jet so many times... their just worn out. Superhornet is a great plane, but I agree with everyone, the Tomcat just looks f'in cool. May have been a different story if Cheny hadn't ordered Grumman to destroy the tooling to build new ones during the A-12 fiasco.
 
Hadn't had all my coffee yet this morning; that's what I should have said - we should have kept the line open and continue to make improvments. Just my 2c.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top