ultrarunner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 4,322
SIG600 said:I don't think ole Chuck could get it aboard.
No arguement from me on that. But I wouldn't want to be on board if he was trying?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SIG600 said:I don't think ole Chuck could get it aboard.
Weasel Keeper said:The F-14 was already 20 years old (developed in 1968, production started 1970) when the F-4s were starting to head out. F-16s and F-18s were still fairly new though compared to the F-4 and F-14.
Still sad to see all the good ones being retired.
VVJM265 said:The Hornet is not exactly a new airplane. And the 16 is even older. If memory serves correct, the YF-17 was Navy's selection for the F-4 and A-7 follow-on after it was decided that the 16 wouldn't be safe enough around the boat with one engine. (Yet the A-7 was a single engine jet...) The 17 evolved into the Hornet. This from the Navy Fact File (available on www.navy.mil):
General Characteristics, C and D models
Primary Function: Multi-role attack and fighter aircraft.Contractor: Prime: McDonnell Douglas; Major Subcontractor: Northrop.Date Deployed: November 1978. Operational - October 1983 (A/B models); September 1987 (C/D models).
Uh, I'd bet that ole Chuck could still outfly most of us pudnockers on this board.............SIG600 said:I don't think ole Chuck could get it aboard.