Hey, Jedi
You can't really use the anti-CFI argument in your case. I appreciate your position. You're caught between running your business, which is flight instruction, and flight instructing. You are to be commended, though, for seeing that your employees are working (and building time) instead of hogging all the flight time and work for yourself. You're apparently doing the right thing by your people, and you're someone I'd want to work for.
You can't really lump Mesa Pilot Development into
per se P-F-T. I worked there for a while. Students get no guarantees. They are told only that they have a chance for a Mesa interview
if they exemplify themselves as quality people and maintain a "B" average in their flight courses. No one is
promised "the interview." They do graduate with 300 hours with 10 of 1900 turbine, and are virtually line-ready. It is a good program. The distinguishing aspect of MAPD from
per se P-F-T is although students are imbued with Mesa line procedures their Commercial-Instrument-Multis can be shopped anywhere. Mesa has hired a large percentage of MAPD grads. It is true that MAPD is a cash cow for the company. Students were paying $35K+ eight years ago. I have no idea how much it is now. Of course, one thing Mesa was always good at was contriving cash cows and making money.
You can say the same thing about Comair not being P-F-T
per se. Those students pay plenty. The best become instructors, and the best of that group are hired.
Decent discussion, considering its early flamebait potential.