Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

There is no pilot shortage sorry. Just greedy airlines.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

MAJICJOHNSON

Active member
Joined
May 1, 2005
Posts
27
The nation's big airlines want you to know that there's a dreadful pilot shortage and they apologize profusely if their commuter-carrier partners cancel flights to your hometown airport due to the debilitating shortfall.

The nation's big airlines don't want you to know that their commuter carriers, which operate half of all the nation's commercial flights, often pay pilots so little that it's often financially wiser to drive a truck or flip fast-food burgers than fly a plane.

And the bosses of the nation's big airlines certainly prefer that you don't conflate the fact that they're cashing in big time with the reality that they continue to insist on financial concessions from their existing pilots.

In case you missed the impossible-to-ignore, cut-to-the-chase conclusion, the pilot shortage is another nasty side effect of the airline's industry race to the bottom of everything from employee wages and benefits to passenger service and comfort. And airline bosses are shocked?shocked!?to find that potential aviators aren't flocking to an industry that offers minimum wages to new employees who've spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to qualify for the job.

Let's start with the immediate business-travel crisis, shall we? In the past few days, at least three carriers have abandoned routes or grounded aircraft due to a lack of pilots Wyoming-based Great Lakes Airlines (Nasdaq: GLUX) dumped six cities in the Midwest and Plains States due to what it called "the severe industry-wide pilot shortage." Republic Airways (Nasdaq: RJET), which flies commuter service for all four of the surviving legacy airlines, is grounding 27 planes and blames the lack of pilots. And United Airlines (NYSE: UAL) claims the decision to eliminate its Cleveland hub is at least partially due to a lack of aviators.

The airlines never mention salaries, of course. Their explanation: a wave of retirements as pilots reach the mandatory retirement age of 65; new federal regulations that require additional crew rest; and federal safety edicts that increase pilot training time.

There's some truth in those excuses, but they were hardly unpredictable occurrences beyond the airline industry's control. Anyone with an actuarial chart could have seen the retirements coming and acted to stock up on younger fliers. The new federal rules that increase the rest that pilots must have connect with shifts that went into effect at the beginning of the year. But they were announced two years ago. The new pilot-training rules, which require a minimum of 1,500 hours of experience compared to the previous threshold of 250 hours, went into effect on August 1, 2013. However, they were more than four years in the making after the fatal 2009 commuter-aircraft crash near Buffalo, New York. In fact, everyone from U.S. senators to the Transportation Department's inspector general criticized the slow rollout of those regulations.

And you know what H.L. Mencken said: "When somebody says it's not about the money, it's about the money." The pilot shortage is most definitely about the money.


There are many sources of data on pilot salaries, but let's look at statistics pulled together by airline consultant Kit Darby and analyzed by the travel site Skift.com.

A first-year co-pilot at a commuter airline may earn as little as $19 per flying hour. After five years with a commuter airline, the average salary is just $40 an hour. For the lowest-paid pilots at a carrier such as Mesa Air Group, which operates flights for both United and US Airways, a 60-hour work week means an effective pay rate of just $8.50 an hour. That's barely above the national minimum wage of $7.25 an hour and below the more than 10 bucks President Barack Obama is making federal contractors pay their workers.

Faced with what it claims is this catastrophic, route-shedding, plane-grounding, hub-killing shortage of aviators, you'd think the airline industry would react with across-the-board pay increases. After all, isn't that how it works in a capitalistic society? When faced with a labor shortage, companies raise their pay scales to attract more workers. You'd think this would be especially true for airline pilots, whose learning curve is steep and expensive and in whose hands rest the lives of passengers and the reputation of their employers.

Yet instead of raising pilot pay rates, airlines are insisting on concessions. One example: the particularly ironic developments at American Airlines Group (Nasdaq: AAL), the parent company of the recently merged American Airlines and US Airways.

According to the Dallas Morning News, the crew that arrived from US Airways back in December to run American Airlines and AAL netted a cool $79 million in stock sales during the last month. That covers chief executive Doug Parker, president Scott Kirby and four other top managers.

At the same time, however, American pressed for another concessionary contract at American Eagle, its wholly owned commuter airline. When the leaders of the pilots union last week decided not to put the contract to a vote of rank-and-file aviators, American management immediately retaliated by deciding to reduce the size of the American Eagle fleet. American's newly enriched managers also claimed that they would search for cheaper commuter carriers to do American's flying.

Whether that is a real-world possibility given the industry-wide pilot shortage remains to be seen. But the incongruity of newly arrived US Airways bosses feathering their financial nests while demanding concessions from their scarcer-than-hen's-teeth pilots did not escape the notice of commentators on a leading airline bulletin board.

American's new bosses "are just cashing in on the fact that they haven't given raises [at US Airways] since 1991," one poster claimed. "They terminat[ed] most of the company contribution to our retirement plan, canceled retiree health care benefits and contracted our work to companies where workers qualify for food stamp."

The commentator's bitter conclusion? "This is where we are in America."
 
The number of commercial pilot certificates granted the last few years were way down compared to normal. The Military isn't producing as many pilots, and using more drones. Retirements are approaching at an alarming rate due to the age 65 pilots approaching that age. (15,000 within the next 10 years at the big 3). So, there is a shortage, here and all over the World. And yes, the regional guys are paid poorly. Age 65 and legacy BKs stagnated everyone, but that is about to change.


Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Anyone who goes to work for the complained about wages IS the problem. You are where you are due to your choices.

Bob
 
Last edited:
The greed is at the senior partner, not the regional. The profits margins forced upon the regional by the major partner make it impossible for them to do anything but cut costs.
 
How many pilots are going to be furloughed because they don't have 1,500hrs?
;)
 
The greed is at the senior partner, not the regional. The profits margins forced upon the regional by the major partner make it impossible for them to do anything but cut costs.

Yeah, I didn't see any greed with the feeders before and after the legacy BKs, with huge profits due to unrealistic contracts back then.... Riiiight. It seems they had explosive growth and big profits, but now it's reversed. I like that better. And, 15,000 job openings coming up if someone doesn't like their situation at the Regionals. The problem is a lot of people don't want to start over. Well, that's their choice.



Bye Bye---General Lee
 
Last edited:
The greed is at the senior partner, not the regional. The profits margins forced upon the regional by the major partner make it impossible for them to do anything but cut costs.

Nope the Regional managements are just as greedy. XJT CEO (BH) got a $5-600 thousand increase to bring his salary, just his salary mind you, to around $1.6 million to mismanage XJT. And then attempted to get both pilot groups to accept concessions. Uh, not gonna happen.
 
Peanuts

Nope the Regional managements are just as greedy. XJT CEO (BH) got a $5-600 thousand increase to bring his salary, just his salary mind you, to around $1.6 million to mismanage XJT. And then attempted to get both pilot groups to accept concessions. Uh, not gonna happen.
That is not what we would call "looking out for the troops", but in the big picture with around 4500 pilots, that bonus spread over that many pilots would result in about a $2.00/wk raise. That would do nothing for anybody.

Yeah, I didn't see any greed with the feeders before and after the legacy BKs, with huge profits due to unrealistic contracts back then.... Riiiight. It seems they had explosive growth and big profits, but now it's reversed. I like that better. Bye Bye---General Lee
How are you going to like it when DAL looses feeder routes and are unable maintain their load factors and they maybe stop hiring and seat advancement because of shrikage?
 
Last edited:
The greed is at the senior partner, not the regional. The profits margins forced upon the regional by the major partner make it impossible for them to do anything but cut costs.

And it's major airline pilots who vote for the whipsaw market. Hence my question
 

Latest resources

Back
Top