bobbysamd
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 5,710
Pilot shortage
Kit may be softpedaling it now, but he has pushed "pilot shortage" since at least 1987. Back then, he said forty-thousand pilots would be needed during the next ten years. As recently as three years ago, he continued to spout that palaver, as published in the Honolulu Advertiser . Please click on the article; it's too lengthy to reprint here. I saw the comment at the end of the article about how a recession could cool off the "demand" for pilots. This is the same crap Kit was putting out in 1987, and he's disseminating it the same way. Notice how Kit is attributed as the source in the article.
Even after 911 and the ensuing furloughs, Kit was minimizing the situation, as found in this post-911 article in USA Today
Nationwide, there are now more pilots on furlough than there are available jobs — 7,500 vs. 6,000 expected hires this year, says Kit Darby, whose firm Air Inc. helps pilots find work.
"It's not as bad as some people think," says Darby, "but it's certainly nothing like before 9/11."
(emphasis added)
Come on. 6,000 pilot openings last year? Not what I was reading last year.
So, you ask, what was the harm with me falling in step with Kit on the pilot "shortage"? As I wrote above, the harm came in the seduction. Once more, Kit made it sound so easy. I still remember his articles about such places as WestAir/United Express. Captain upgrades in eight months. He made it sound like it was nothing to get an interview. Build your quals to published limits, send in your resumes, and multiple phone calls will come in days - because there was a "shortage" of pilots. He made navigating through the pilot interview sound like a piece of cake for anyone with at least a modicum of intelligence and flying ability. None of this was true at all. I learned the truth with no help from Kit. He could have been more truthful about garnering an interview, that it would likely take repeated sendings of resumes and apps, that the odds were against you because of the fierce competition, and that a pilot interview was more like an interview to hire a CEO of a large corporation. But if Kit told it like it really was people would have been scared off and he would not have been able to build FAPA/Air, Inc. into the collossus, empire and monopoly it is. Therein lies the harm.
Kit may be softpedaling it now, but he has pushed "pilot shortage" since at least 1987. Back then, he said forty-thousand pilots would be needed during the next ten years. As recently as three years ago, he continued to spout that palaver, as published in the Honolulu Advertiser . Please click on the article; it's too lengthy to reprint here. I saw the comment at the end of the article about how a recession could cool off the "demand" for pilots. This is the same crap Kit was putting out in 1987, and he's disseminating it the same way. Notice how Kit is attributed as the source in the article.
Even after 911 and the ensuing furloughs, Kit was minimizing the situation, as found in this post-911 article in USA Today
Nationwide, there are now more pilots on furlough than there are available jobs — 7,500 vs. 6,000 expected hires this year, says Kit Darby, whose firm Air Inc. helps pilots find work.
"It's not as bad as some people think," says Darby, "but it's certainly nothing like before 9/11."
(emphasis added)
Come on. 6,000 pilot openings last year? Not what I was reading last year.
So, you ask, what was the harm with me falling in step with Kit on the pilot "shortage"? As I wrote above, the harm came in the seduction. Once more, Kit made it sound so easy. I still remember his articles about such places as WestAir/United Express. Captain upgrades in eight months. He made it sound like it was nothing to get an interview. Build your quals to published limits, send in your resumes, and multiple phone calls will come in days - because there was a "shortage" of pilots. He made navigating through the pilot interview sound like a piece of cake for anyone with at least a modicum of intelligence and flying ability. None of this was true at all. I learned the truth with no help from Kit. He could have been more truthful about garnering an interview, that it would likely take repeated sendings of resumes and apps, that the odds were against you because of the fierce competition, and that a pilot interview was more like an interview to hire a CEO of a large corporation. But if Kit told it like it really was people would have been scared off and he would not have been able to build FAPA/Air, Inc. into the collossus, empire and monopoly it is. Therein lies the harm.
Last edited: