You totally missed the whole point of what I was saying...You said you would sacrifice for the greater good...If that greater good could only be done with DOH, would you support it...?
Depends. And I mean that. I am more worried about fixing the mess than a few seniority numbers, but I am one voice of our group.
I prefer what I proposed, and I am more than happy to protect your seat, as in year four here I am making about 106 an hr. I would not go to your seat even if it paid slightly more an hr. I like the QOL I have. Your seat becomes an option to me only when others are not available.
If you want to stay on the CRJ70/90 for the rest of your career I am totally fine protecting your right, but what happens when that sucker is parked in 10 years?
I know you have the retirement schedule and can see that after the next three years, we start a constant march out the door. Guys senior to you bidding your seat just would not be a worry. I understand the concern, but by the time we got this whole deal together, it would be a non issue, and even you have to agree with that!
I don't want DOH....I simply want protection from getting bumped out of what I have....I'm perfectly happy where I am....
Read above
I only advocate DOH when I hear "staple" from your side....Neither is reasonable in my opinion...I'm not about to go sit MD80 reserve in JFK....just as I don't expect to be MD80 Capt. in ATL.....
I would be more than willing to protect your seat for three to five years, but what if DAL decided to move your flying to NYC? You cannot protect a base.
What you wrote above is a fear. NYC is not that bad, but I get what you are saying. You just want to stay in ATL.
Your math is a little fuzzy...I think you mean 65% would gladly take that pure staple...You are probably right, but you won't get a deal without the 35%.....We're kinda like the US Senate...This 35% can fillabuster...I know at least 3 of the 4 new MEC members wouldn't accept a deal that allows the senior ASA pilots to be bumped out of their position....
Sorry, you are right, math sucked, and I was chasing a two year old around the house.
My point was just because you would not want it, does not mean that it would not happen. Look at the vote in the senate today, I know you and I do not want that.
Again, DOH is only a starting position of mine if you insist on a pure staple....If you want to be reasonable, then we can be reasonable....
Of interest, the Medex MEC just asked for DOH with RAH for furlough recall...That seniority list with RAH/Frontier/Medex is going to reshuffle the deck for any future arbitrations....Times are a changing.....
Read above.
It may, but it may not. I know that with the power brokers on this side, what they want or propose would be of little concern.
Fact is that there have been some half baked attempts at unity and I do not support flows as replacement for all of the flying being on one list. That is what a flow is designed to do . If it was a step one to a combined list fine, but they cannot stand alone. Add to it, it would make DCI cheap again, and IMHO that is not good for anyone.
Right now I see the goal as maintain, get the 100 seater on our property, go after the 100-69 seat market a few airframes at a time. Certain things may speed that up like the rest rules or a little law requiring companies to perform their own flying.