TA pay vs. FA pay

[Snakeplt]

NumberCruncher (Shamtulli)...your ignorance flows like diahrea from my ass. I think we have found SHAMtulli's screen name here on the board LOLOLOL.

Just for kicks you DOLT, name ONE pilot group that EVER received less after a contract was voted down...you CAN'T because it has NEVER happened ! Idiot !

And if this isn't RICHY, it's surely one our MEC "boys."

 

[Number$Cruncher]

NumberCruncher (Shamtulli)...your ignorance flows like diahrea from my ass. I think we have found SHAMtulli's screen name here on the board LOLOLOL.

Just for kicks you DOLT, name ONE pilot group that EVER received less after a contract was voted down...you CAN'T because it has NEVER happened ! Idiot !

And if this isn't RICHY, it's surely one our MEC "boys."

I'm flattered, but I'm not "Richy." And I don't have a 737 type. Not yet. Nor do I have a house in PBI. Not yet. Anyway, ignorance is not something I'm blessed with, because friend, otherwise I'd be more like you.. VmaxFlyR, your post was articulate and conversational, so it'd be a pleasure to continue the dialogue with you. Snakepit can watch.

About the legal ramifications of shutting down Netjets; they'd hardly be a deterrent from folding the program. While messy, a bankruptcy would allow the company to reject most, if not all of its existing contracts. The owners are pretty clean. As secured creditors, in that they own the aircraft, the liquidation would be cleaner than what would happen at a airline-like company that owns or leases its aircraft. The owners would be stuck holding shared ownership contacts tied to their specific serial numbers, and someone would make a boatload of money remarketing these aircraft on their behalf. Core aircraft would be sold and used to pay off other creditors.

Warren Buffet's job is to maximize the return of the BH portfolio to its shareholders, and Netjets is a very, very small piece of that portfolio. To sell off (or liquidate) an underperforming asset is just another business decision people like him get paid to do. Admittedly, the fact of the matter is that many of BH shareholders are Netjets owners, and that emotional connection might temper what might otherwise be a very, very easy decision to exorcize the company from the BH family. Those kind of emotional decisions do find their way into strategic planning every now and then, as evidenced by many corporate travel needs that would be more economically met by fractional or charter than by existing in-house flight departments.

There has also been some discussion on this board about the growth of Netjets assets over the last few years, and that this is somehow evidence of Netjets financial strength. Growth in aircraft assets has virtually NO effect on the company's ability to continue as an ongoing concern. The company does not own them, and cannot leverage them to obtain operating capital. The lifeblood of this type of business is the cash generated from operations, not assets under management. Your point, maximizing profits by minimizing costs, is correct, and is always going to be the way an aircraft operating company succeeds. Southwest, JetBlue, and AirTran all do this. Southwest is facing "cost-creep", and its day of reckoning is coming. Bigger is not always better, especially in the aviation business.

About Comair/Delta. You mentioned that "NetJets Inc is no Delta, as Comair had the threat that other DL outlets/suppliers (ASA along with other regionals that are "wings-for-hire"). There is no one else to do NJA flying, at least at this time." That's true, but from the BH perspective...who cares? Why does BH care whether Netjets' former customers can find someone else to carry them around? Delta needed Comair's feed, and had the benefit of ASA and others to take up the Comair slack. Berkshire Hathaway has no "need" for Netjets' lift. It needs return on invested capital, profits, cash generated from operations.

The only, only thing that Netjets might have going for it is that Warren Buffet is known to have amazing patience in his investments. But faced with the grief of a nasty labor issue with the pilots, how long do you think he'd be willing to wait?

 

[Lord Wakefield]

Just for kicks you DOLT, name ONE pilot group that EVER received less after a contract was voted down...you CAN'T because it has NEVER happened ! Idiot !

AA, Comair, Qantas, Iberia, Wein, NWA, Eastern

 

[Number$Cruncher]

NumberCruncher (Shamtulli)...your ignorance flows like diahrea from my ass. I think we have found SHAMtulli's screen name here on the board LOLOLOL.

Just for kicks you DOLT, name ONE pilot group that EVER received less after a contract was voted down...you CAN'T because it has NEVER happened ! Idiot !

And if this isn't RICHY, it's surely one our MEC "boys."

Nope, not Richy. Not MEC. And you are wrong, it HAS happened. In addition to those mentioned by Lord Wakefield (a partial list), I'd bet a lot that the Delta boys wish they would have taken management's offer last fall.

The bottom line here, son, is that if you want to protect your future, you need to diversify your income stream. Don't expect union representation protect it for you. Contracts that don't jive with market forces simply don't last. Once you get a bit more established in your career, develop a second income source. Someday you will need it.

 

[bluepost]

It is a bit premature to start taking polls before the MEC starts its 20+ roadshows. I have not heard it, but I have talked to 6 fleet reps, 2 mec members, and a couple high profile pilots. This will be a tough fight. Don't think we can go in there and they won't be prepared. They are very convincing.

The only way we are going to win this battle is on principle and integrity. We have to play the card that says we will not vote in these wages on a first vote with opinions from ONE MEC, from 284, and without ANY pressure. Their argument is very strong. Don't underestimate your enemy. There is a REAL chance that we will not win this battle after it is voted down.

The question is not will you come out ahead in 12 months if you vote NO like the MEC asks...the question is will you come out ahead in 5 YEARS if you vote YES?

Nobody wants to kill the company if we don't need to, BUT we sure do need to slice their ear off.

We have lost already in many respects. Just SEEING a TA this bad was a loss, and has lowered expectations. The fact that the MEC is selling this SO hard is a sign of their conviction and strength. They admit to it being crap.
Voting Yes is not for next time. Voting NO is for next time. The company will think twice about putting our salaries on the back burner, but only if we bloody them a bit now. You rarely get in a fight and not get bloodied yourself, no matter how much you win by.

Even if they ARE being forthright now, if this gets voted in, it will temp them to go back to thier old ways next time, and who is to say BB will still be here in 3 years to "protect" us from Santulli.

Vote No for whatever reason you want, but understand that others don't share your views. I am voting No because NO MATTER WHAT, I will not say YES to a contract that pays me 11% over the next 3 years. Others will say, flex this, and IOE that, and RCA this and now my extended day rate will be $700 a day, and 12 of those a year...blah blah blah, I am making 110k. It will happen. It already has, and you would never believe to who.

I have people with a lot more information than I have betting me drinks it will pass.

 

[SenorSpielbergo]

I'm flattered, but I'm not "Richy." And I don't have a 737 type. Not yet. Nor do I have a house in PBI. Not yet. Anyway, ignorance is not something I'm blessed with, because friend, otherwise I'd be more like you.. VmaxFlyR, your post was articulate and conversational, so it'd be a pleasure to continue the dialogue with you. Snakepit can watch.

About the legal ramifications of shutting down Netjets; they'd hardly be a deterrent from folding the program. While messy, a bankruptcy would allow the company to reject most, if not all of its existing contracts. The owners are pretty clean. As secured creditors, in that they own the aircraft, the liquidation would be cleaner than what would happen at a airline-like company that owns or leases its aircraft. The owners would be stuck holding shared ownership contacts tied to their specific serial numbers, and someone would make a boatload of money remarketing these aircraft on their behalf. Core aircraft would be sold and used to pay off other creditors.

Warren Buffet's job is to maximize the return of the BH portfolio to its shareholders, and Netjets is a very, very small piece of that portfolio. To sell off (or liquidate) an underperforming asset is just another business decision people like him get paid to do. Admittedly, the fact of the matter is that many of BH shareholders are Netjets owners, and that emotional connection might temper what might otherwise be a very, very easy decision to exorcize the company from the BH family. Those kind of emotional decisions do find their way into strategic planning every now and then, as evidenced by many corporate travel needs that would be more economically met by fractional or charter than by existing in-house flight departments.

There has also been some discussion on this board about the growth of Netjets assets over the last few years, and that this is somehow evidence of Netjets financial strength. Growth in aircraft assets has virtually NO effect on the company's ability to continue as an ongoing concern. The company does not own them, and cannot leverage them to obtain operating capital. The lifeblood of this type of business is the cash generated from operations, not assets under management. Your point, maximizing profits by minimizing costs, is correct, and is always going to be the way an aircraft operating company succeeds. Southwest, JetBlue, and AirTran all do this. Southwest is facing "cost-creep", and its day of reckoning is coming. Bigger is not always better, especially in the aviation business.

About Comair/Delta. You mentioned that "NetJets Inc is no Delta, as Comair had the threat that other DL outlets/suppliers (ASA along with other regionals that are "wings-for-hire"). There is no one else to do NJA flying, at least at this time." That's true, but from the BH perspective...who cares? Why does BH care whether Netjets' former customers can find someone else to carry them around? Delta needed Comair's feed, and had the benefit of ASA and others to take up the Comair slack. Berkshire Hathaway has no "need" for Netjets' lift. It needs return on invested capital, profits, cash generated from operations.

The only, only thing that Netjets might have going for it is that Warren Buffet is known to have amazing patience in his investments. But faced with the grief of a nasty labor issue with the pilots, how long do you think he'd be willing to wait?

So, therefore, all of this is a reasonable excuse to keep corn-holing pilots. Great.

 

[VmaxFlyR]

Number$Cruncher:

You present some well thought-out, but not necessarily accurate, IMHO, perspectives.

Should BH decide to divest itself of NJA, although at this time I don't see it happening, NJA would not necessarily just "disappear." Assuming the basic "fractional model" originally designed by Santulli is not inherently and fatally flawed (as I, and WB, and you (?) all apparently agree), if any provider is best positioned to dominate (read: expand, prosper & eventually profit), it should be NJA, and a lot of smart & well connected (socially, financially, and, politically?) folks know that. This concept has now even made it's way into smaller, piston aircraft, and we've had time share properties for how long?

NJA produces huge, valuable cashflow, as well as a captive customer for BH's other division, FlightSafety, covering fixed expenses over there, even at "negociated, discounted" fee structures. In holdings as vast as BH, it all can add up...

And the the fracas from the actions of those owners, along with their 1-15 partners, whom have been handed the keys to a jet that has far more hours on it than "they've" utilized (remember, an owner may never fly in their own jet, but they're flying in someone's, that poor devil, as they fly off their contract hours) in a suddenly over supplied and soft market will be an attorney's bonanza in itself. BTW, when is it ever too late to take the bar?

Should BH "tire" of NJA, there would exist an opportunity that it could go the way it may have already gone had WB not jumped in, to become a public company. Now that may be contrary to Santulli's overall goals of control and self-determination, but I've learned to "never say never..." Circumstances, value and market opportunities could end up being a powerful aphrodisiac for Santulli and WB. NJA is still Santulli's "baby," and BH holds portions of many, many other public companies. Could the settlement of this contract (as the T/A is written) be a new prom dress in NJA's ultimate future?

Could there be a need for a realignment of costs, or a "tweaking" of the fractional model? Possibly, but from what I've read about ineffiencies and out-right waste at NJA, this contract is not the wisest place to start, or to view as the answer to NJA's ultimate "profitablity," which as I stated earlier, I do not believe is the current tactic. Despite what Santilli's, NJA's upper leadship, and even WB's feelings may be about their pilots, they are "stuck" with them because as you've said, NJA is not an airline-type company. Nor are they really an aircraft operating comapny, as you've indicated in your cost comparison to SWA/JB. Both those companies do own their aircraft.

NJA is a service company (and admittedly a sales company, however that "division" is totally dependant on "service..."), even more so than SWA and JB may see themselves, for the above asset management rather than ownership reason, not that I'd believe profit is not generated through the hourly occupied fees. NJA pilots are the rank-and-file, day-to-day, frontline providers. Why Santilli/management/HB, or any wise manager with a supposed eye on the long term, would not want to guarantee the aircraft owner's expected level of satisfaction (read: repeat customers, referrals, future sales, etc.) has me puzzled...How much long term damage has been done in this tactic? The fact that the owners have not become involved yet sounds like it may change with a "new MEC."

NJA will have to become very creative in thier marketing message & strategy if they plan to sell themselves as the most solid, most experienced, most safe provider, if they put in place an environment that does not encourage those same values in their pilots, one of their main "service providers."

My understanding is that there will be a sizable portion of the existing work force that will not choose NJA as a career, while NJA will attract less experienced, less committed "time-builders" or "type-seekers" as already indicate on this board. This just doesn't bode well for a supposed "high-level, service company," nor for bottom line training and turnover costs, if this is supposed what management is hoping to contain.

And face it, were not talking about an eventual "Wal-martification" of this fractional industry as has occurred in the airline seat/commodity industry, because the financial commitment by the owners is waayyyy out of reach of anybody other than this country's established and privileged elite--indeed, the whole fractional, particularly NJA's, image is designed to be anti-mass, "Anti-WalMart."

My understanding is that once NJA "sells out" an aircarft, it no long is an assset to NJA--the profits of the sale contibute to the bottom line (somewhere.) I agree that core aircraft are a part of NJA's asset base, but that alone does not count for the growth of the net value of NJA, unless some rather deceptive accounting has been applied, which I stongly doubt.

BH does, or should care, about the ""need" for Netjets' lift," because that is what NJA and the fractional model is all about, unless BH or NJA just wants to be an aircraft broker.

The

"return on invested capital, profits, cash generated from operations" is there and again, were I Santulli/BH I may have considered the same tactic, but in the end it could undermine those same long term strategies they ultimately pursue. There seems to be a disconnect in BH/NJA long term goals and the current tactics, whether they are successful in getting this T/A passed or not, unless I'm missing something.

This will be an interesting, drawn out, but hopefully not sad, eventual process for all involved...stay tuned.

 

[Number$Cruncher]

Excellent! An intelligent debate!

This will be an interesting, drawn out, but hopefully not sad, eventual process for all involved...stay tuned.

I couldn't agree more. Your thoughts are worthy of careful consideration, so I'm going to wait until I have a few minutes later tonight to reply.

 

[kingtut]

Wonderful discussion, don't mean nothing. WB is in the winter of his life (Sadly, his wife of many years just past.) so what will his successor do? Will he be as willing to wait as WB? We'll see!! Mean time, I suggest we not price ourselves out of the competition.

Who will fly the rich and famous around you ask? CS. FO, FLEX.

Bye for now and bye bonds.

 

[netjetwife]

Research results---thanks to JM--another NJwife.

Gentlemen, why not let Mr.Buffet speak for himself on the question of whether or not he is prepared to wait for the returns on BH's investment in NJA? Quoting from the 2003 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Meeting:[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"There are three major competitors. We have always been the biggest and our market share is rising. At 75% recently. I believe all of our competitors are losing money on an operating basis -- not even including asset write-downs. I think some of them will exit the industry -- look at Raytheon's recent prospectus. There will be a shake out, and we will not be one of the ones shook. [/font]

[font=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]This will eventually be a huge business for us -- 10 times what it is currently."[/font]

www.tilsonfunds.com/brkmtg03notes.html

Those are not the comments of an inpatient man--sounds more like bragging!
For those that scoffed at me for claiming that NJA has 75% of the market, note that I had a very good source. The money for professional pilot salaries-NBAA standard-- IS THERE! It's just been poured back into the business, growing the company at the expense of the pilots and their families. Enough already! It is time to invest in the pilots. The TA will not pass.
NJWife/LB