SWAPA spending a million dollars to fight seniority integration?

[instructordude]

I don't see anything fair and equitable about an F9 FO sliding in above me who went straight from the right seat at my previous airline with no PIC to the right seat at F9 considering the hiring requirements at SWA. I think there is something in that law about career expectations and that should apply to people like the pilots I mentioned above.

What is fair and equitable depends on your view point. I a are betting on relative seniortity and a 2 to 1 SIL ratio for each seat. That is fair and equitable.

 

[scoreboardII]

07-31-2009, 07:44 #25 instructordude


PS: Get use to fair and equitable based on seat position. Its Federal Law....Get use to it tough guy.

BM applies AFTER a purchase is completed, if however a presale deal is made to staple (per Kelly letter stating a mutually agreed contract plan of hiring as needed), then that deal is the law. Get used to it.

 

[scoreboardII]

I a are betting on relative seniortity and a 2 to 1 SIL ratio for each seat. That is fair and equitable.

You are on serious hallucinogenics my friend...

Fair and equitable for a bankrupt employee is a paycheck starting at the bottom of the buying company. Get used to it.