thebluto
Forgot flightinfo existed
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2001
- Posts
- 204
There's been some discussion of logging PIC on the board, especially on the following threads:
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?t=44838
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?t=44165
I've got an issue to raise about military aircraft with three pilots aboard. This has been batted around a number of times, and I've seen guys get interviewed and hired (specifically at SWA) by looking at it two different ways.
We all know if you didn't sign for the airplane, you are not the PIC. So, many folks I know claim that if you signed for the airplane, you are the PIC, regardless if you went to the back of the plane to take a nap, get coffee, go potty, etc.
I believe chase mentioned in one of the posts above, that you shouldn't log time in the rack, etc. I can buy this line of reasoning also. And, I know a couple of guys at SWA who calculated their hours this way, but I know more that counted all of their Aircraft Commander time, in or out of the seat as PIC.
But, here is the issue: If you're not supposed to count the time out of the seat as PIC when you signed for the plane, does that mean there's no PIC during that portion of the flight?
Example: The plane was airborne for 9 hours. 3 hours of that time the Aircraft Commander who signed for the plane is out of the seat. So, only 6 hours of it can be claimed as PIC by anyone if he or she is out of the seat.
Seems a little odd to me. The two pilots flying can't log it, because they didn't sign for the plane, but the AC can't count it because he or she is not flying.
So, does that mean the plane is airborne for 3 hours without a PIC?
It doesn't really matter to me personally. With the .3 per sortie conversion at SWA, I've got 2540 hours PIC turbine with all my time as Aircraft Commander, and 2350 if I don't count 1/3 of my P-3 PIC time. It's not going to make or break me in relation to 1000 hours PIC or whatever the competitive number is now.
I know we could go around and around about this all day. Arguing who's a better pilot, how worthless this or that type of plane is, civ vs mil, etc. But, I think there's a definite gray area here for a small segment of us in the military.
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?t=44838
http://forums.flightinfo.com/showthread.php?t=44165
I've got an issue to raise about military aircraft with three pilots aboard. This has been batted around a number of times, and I've seen guys get interviewed and hired (specifically at SWA) by looking at it two different ways.
We all know if you didn't sign for the airplane, you are not the PIC. So, many folks I know claim that if you signed for the airplane, you are the PIC, regardless if you went to the back of the plane to take a nap, get coffee, go potty, etc.
I believe chase mentioned in one of the posts above, that you shouldn't log time in the rack, etc. I can buy this line of reasoning also. And, I know a couple of guys at SWA who calculated their hours this way, but I know more that counted all of their Aircraft Commander time, in or out of the seat as PIC.
But, here is the issue: If you're not supposed to count the time out of the seat as PIC when you signed for the plane, does that mean there's no PIC during that portion of the flight?
Example: The plane was airborne for 9 hours. 3 hours of that time the Aircraft Commander who signed for the plane is out of the seat. So, only 6 hours of it can be claimed as PIC by anyone if he or she is out of the seat.
Seems a little odd to me. The two pilots flying can't log it, because they didn't sign for the plane, but the AC can't count it because he or she is not flying.
So, does that mean the plane is airborne for 3 hours without a PIC?
It doesn't really matter to me personally. With the .3 per sortie conversion at SWA, I've got 2540 hours PIC turbine with all my time as Aircraft Commander, and 2350 if I don't count 1/3 of my P-3 PIC time. It's not going to make or break me in relation to 1000 hours PIC or whatever the competitive number is now.
I know we could go around and around about this all day. Arguing who's a better pilot, how worthless this or that type of plane is, civ vs mil, etc. But, I think there's a definite gray area here for a small segment of us in the military.
Last edited: