Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA to be #3 in size soon

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

satpak77

Marriott Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2003
Posts
3,015
Course corrections ahead at Southwest



[size=+1]New CEO believes cost cuts and growth will win back Wall Street
[/size]

[size=-1]11:06 PM CDT on Friday, July 16, 2004 [/size]

[size=-1]By ERIC TORBENSON / The Dallas Morning News [/size]

By almost any measure, Southwest Airlines Co. soon will be among the nation's top three or four airlines.

As the Dallas carrier's newly appointed chief executive, Gary Kelly has the job of making sure Southwest continues to look nothing like its competitors – culturally, perceptually and especially financially.

Unfortunately, one situation Mr. Kelly inherited does resemble Southwest's troubled competitors: its mostly stagnant stock price.

By other measures, the carrier is making big gains. It remains the most profitable company in the industry. And most months, it carries more domestic passengers than any other airline.

In three years it will be No. 3 in fleet size measured by large jets, surpassing bankrupt United Airlines Inc., which analysts guess will shrink in coming months.

After it was announced Thursday that he was succeeding Jim Parker as CEO, Mr. Kelly said he he would keep Southwest profitable, but he hinted the road ahead may be paved with new thinking.



Critical cost cuts


With airfares flat or declining, Southwest's success depends on keeping its costs close to 7.5 cents for each seat mile flown. Those costs rose above 8 cents per "unit" in the second quarter, raising red flags on Wall Street.

But Mr. Kelly believes his airline's growth plan, along with new technology, can get costs back where they need to be.

"We've changed a great deal in the past three years," he said on a conference call Thursday, noting self-service kiosks at airports, an enhanced Web site and winglets installed on aircraft to save fuel.

Mr. Kelly also referred to new approaches the airline has taken to its cost problems. And he said he has ideas he didn't have the authority to try just two days ago as chief financial officer.

"When you're the CFO, you're a lieutenant, and you're a loyal lieutenant," he said. "You play a role you're asked to play."

Mr. Kelly now has broader authority to dictate how the airline thinks. An example of his innovation will be evident in its fall schedule, which starts in October.

The schedule trims some lightly filled short-haul flights – including a couple stragglers out of Dallas Love Field – that weren't making much money. With new fare and inventory software that Mr. Kelly shepherded in as chief financial officer, the carrier can maximize revenue on each airplane.

Next up: Running the new schedule through a different program to optimize costs. "There's a lot more we can squeeze out of it," he said.



More up for grabs


There's also plenty more revenue to grab in the domestic market for Southwest, analysts say.

The carrier could increase its $6 billion in annual revenue by as much as 50 percent by just "connecting the dots" between its cities on both coasts, wrote analyst Gary Chase of Lehman Bros.

James Higgins of Credit Suisse First Boston upgraded Southwest shares Friday on the strength of its expansion plans in comparison to the struggles of traditional carriers.

Southwest doesn't have to add big cities such as Philadelphia to succeed financially.

"They can just backfill the routes they already have with more frequencies," said Darryl Jenkins, a visiting professor at Embry Riddle Aeronautical University and a longtime airline consultant.

Traditional full-service airlines such as Fort Worth-based American Airlines Inc. – what the industry calls legacy carriers – have little defense against lower-cost Southwest.

Those that go head-to-head with Southwest have no choice but to match the low fares and hope fliers dislike the discounter's no-frills service. American, with its higher costs, can't earn a profit charging Southwest's prices.

Southwest has more growth coming; it has orders, options and purchase rights for 372 more Boeing 737s, more large jets than No. 5 Continental Airlines flies today.



Growth continues


In terms of seat miles flown, Southwest will probably jump into the No. 4 slot from No. 6 in just two years as it expands its schedule 10 percent next year and beyond. And that includes the international flying done by its competitors, something Southwest doesn't do. Measured solely by domestic flying, it's almost United's size.

"Southwest will make a habit of making life miserable for the legacy carriers," Mr. Jenkins said. The only thing that can stop Southwest, he said: "An act of God."

Mr. Kelly, 49, is less concerned with competitors than with maintaining Southwest's culture. Like chairman Herb Kelleher and Mr. Parker, he believes taking care of employees first will lead to satisfied customers and, ultimately, happy shareholders.

"We want this to continue to be a great place to work," Mr. Kelly said. Moving the stock price would be the most effective morale tool, as the carrier's 32,000 employees are its largest group of stockholders.

"Every cent move means millions of dollars lost or gained," said Gary Shults, president of Transport Workers Union Local 555, which represents ground workers at the airline. "It's a big deal."

Mr. Kelly recognizes that he won't do himself any favors by mimicking Mr. Kelleher's firebrand style. "I don't for one minute think that I can be a Herb or a Jim, and I won't try to be."

 
Aren't they like the MESA of the nationals?

I mean they pay less than the legacy carriers, they make you pay for a type before you interview, they are non-union and they are trying to take over everybody's flying. How come I don't hear a bunch of SWA bashing like they do regarding Mesa?

I'm not trying to start any crap with the guys that work at SWA, I know quite a few. But what I really don't understand is how all the regional pukes beat on Mesa, but SWA is O.K.

There is a correlation there...and I just don't understand it why it's alright to pick on one...but not the other.

Like I said, no offense to those working or looking to work at SWA...but it does seem funny that Mesa is a fair target...but SWA isn't. Maybe what I'm really trying to say is that I don't understand the Mesa bashing.
 
Uninformed

So when did American and United rasie their 737 rates above SW? Unless American or United suddenly started paying more then SW pilots on the same equipment are bettered paid. And I didn't know that Southwest's in house union was no more...hmm...I guess I better get with the times.

Maybe you should know what you are talking about before you post.
 
FN- A SWA pilot would have to give the details but I think their pay is pretty good. They have a different formula, not hourly but trip? And, you can interview without the type but it would probably kick you to the front of the line for a call. Of course, even with the type there are no guarantees! Many folks out there with a type and no time. But, the type is something that you have for good on your cert. Maybe a BBJ job available? (No jokes!)

I would think that SWA has favorable work rules compared to Mesa. It is not an apples to apples comparison. Cheers, Wil
 
With our pay raise in Sept only Delta is ahead of SWA in narrow body pay. Yes the legacy carriers pay more than SWA if you include their wide body equipment, but if you compare apples to apples (narrow body to narrow body) SWA is far from the bottom.

As for unions SWA has the most unions per employee group than any other airline. Here are the employee groups that are unionized that I remember; Pilots, F/As, Mechanics, Dispatchers, Rampers, Provisioners, Customer Service Agents, Operation Agents, Simulator Technitions, & Simulator Instructors.

As for paying for the type you only need it to get a class date if hired, you don't need it for the interview. Additionally SWA doesn't care how you got the type, you can get it from Uncle Sam, a previous employer, from a scholarship, or pay for it yourself. Again SWA doesn't care where or how you got the type, only that you got one.
 
Thanks wil and tanker, I DID NOT realize that SWA was unionized and also thanks for enlightening me on the pay comparison of similar equipment at legacy carriers.

I have a friend who is on leave from work right now and is at higher power getting his type. I haven't had a chance to talk to him about his application status or whether he's been scheduled for an interview. He's a pretty good joe...I think he will fit in good at SWA and I think it's a good move for him.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top