Paul R. Smith
Fender Bender
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2004
- Posts
- 722
They asked for a chance to Re-vote on that Inhoffe ammemndment.
They reference the fact that 4 nations in ICAO allow for pilots over the age of sixty to fly under part 121 as pic or otherwise and that no problems indicate a trend in degrading performance. Some people of the nations under ICAO don't shower but once a week. They part they left out.
MY OPINION>>> If that happens you can tack an extra 5+ years to the regional portion of your career. Which 9/11 already added 4-5 years to it. And add about another couple thousand+ furloughs from the airlines. They need to retire the high dollar guys not get rid of the new-(low dollar)-hires. This will cause much pain for pilots on the bottom 50% of all airline seniority lists...Jobs lost, Positions lost, Bases lost, and Money lost. I think its bad for all of us if the age requirement goes to 65 or even 63. Alot of Retired guys will want to come back to work especially at the LCCs where they did not have a pension plan to begin with. They will want to make more money to add to their social security and 401-k.
All I can say is that if you value your career's progression in the upward direction then you will write your senators even the Republican ones and urge them to vote against this.
They reference the fact that 4 nations in ICAO allow for pilots over the age of sixty to fly under part 121 as pic or otherwise and that no problems indicate a trend in degrading performance. Some people of the nations under ICAO don't shower but once a week. They part they left out.
MY OPINION>>> If that happens you can tack an extra 5+ years to the regional portion of your career. Which 9/11 already added 4-5 years to it. And add about another couple thousand+ furloughs from the airlines. They need to retire the high dollar guys not get rid of the new-(low dollar)-hires. This will cause much pain for pilots on the bottom 50% of all airline seniority lists...Jobs lost, Positions lost, Bases lost, and Money lost. I think its bad for all of us if the age requirement goes to 65 or even 63. Alot of Retired guys will want to come back to work especially at the LCCs where they did not have a pension plan to begin with. They will want to make more money to add to their social security and 401-k.
All I can say is that if you value your career's progression in the upward direction then you will write your senators even the Republican ones and urge them to vote against this.