Secret Squirrel
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2003
- Posts
- 1,257
satpak77 said:He very well could have violated the 8 hour rule, etc etc. But for FEDERAL CRIMINAL PROSECUTION I don't think its gonna happen.
They can proceed and go to court and 3 years later they will come to the point we are at now, a dismissal or not-guilty verdict.
We have yet to see if the officer using the breathalizer had undergone formal training with the device, or if the batteries were fresh, not old, etc etc.
These were FBI agents, who broke off from their Enron inside trading sales investigation, and Airport cops, who got called away from the Starbucks, who gave the tests. Not the State Highway Patrol DUI task force. Sure, the local $299 Express-Lasik doc could laser your eyes, and it probably will be fine, but the $5000 per eye doc at John Hopkins or Mayo Clinic might do it better.
Maybe the model Breathalizer they used had a service bulletin (yes I am serious) last year and needed extra calibration or a part replaced. Maybe it was not complied with. Etc
LOTS of angles yet to be pursued by a good defense attorney. Thats why a good DUI attorney charges $10,000 to "make it go away." How bad do you need the DUI dismissed? Yes, we take American Express. etc etc
As far as FAA, company regs, etc etc, that is another topic.
Hopefully his attorney at this point told him to stop making statements about grenades of vodka and how he did this and that, etc. NO STATEMENTS. More people have been sent to prison by their own mouth its sad.
Anyway....My position is that a successful federal criminal prosecution is not possible.
Thats right, it is always somebody elses fault. Take no responsability for your actions, it was a faulty tester yada yada yada. I think I would really give the guy more credit if he gave a press conference and said I am an alcoholic and I made a huge mistake instead of standing behind some $hitbag lawyer crying that the tester had old batteries.