Guys,
My recollection of the process (somewhat dated info) is this:
- if you absolutely tube the interview & there is no way that they'll hire you, references probably won't be called, as the decision board is going to reject you anyway. Infrequent.
- if you do okay at the interview, then they'll call your references and the results of those conversations will be part of the info that's before the DB. This happens most of the time.
- the DB can then say "yes" or "no" based on all the info they have: resume, flying history, interview results, references, everything.
So, having references called is a good sign, though not a certain "you'll be hired" by any means.
I'd also note, that some people you'd THINK would have the common sense that God gave dirt to LET YOU KNOW that they just had a nice chat with a pilot from Southwest about you, DON'T! (Still slightly peeved at one former boss who neglected to mention that he'd had such a conversation until about a week later... sheesh, dude! A week's worth of stress you could have saved me...) Now, if you're talking to your references every day & they all are saying "nope, not a word," that's a bad sign, but the fact that they haven't called you to say "yeah, just had a chat..." doesn't necessarily mean quite as much.
Also, with the workload that the reference-checkers have right now, no telling what their backlog is; I'd give them a while before getting stressed about it... yeah, sure, easy for me to say, I know. But honestly, at least a week, probably more like 2 after the interview, before starting to worry "they should have called somebody by now." AND, if even one reference gets called, that's the good sign. The others will get called as well in that case, as workload allows.
Hope that helps.
Best wishes,
Snoopy
Oh, by the way, the guy getting move to the later DB: happens for various reasons, all of which amount to the package not being complete by the deadline for the first DB. Could be due to delays contacting references, getting records back from previous employers, delayed drug test results, or just simple administrative limits. As far as I've heard, there's nothing to be read into it... no better nor worse off for meeting a later DB.