Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA/Airtran Process Agreement??

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I can't understand why you think facts are so hard?

Just look at the actual numbers and evidence. I like how you are focused on pr statements used to appease stockholders and the doj.

Riiiiigggghhhhttttt.

The latest statement from GK on May 10th was a week AFTER DOCC, two weeks AFTER DOJ approval, and six weeks AFTER AAI shareholder approval. Who is GK trying to appease now?

Me thinks he may be trying to inject some reality into the thought processes of his own troops.
 
Who has the tougher job? The SWA MC, or the AT MC? I think clearly the SWA MC has the tougher job. They have a determined group of FO's and junior CA's looking for protection with this SLI and there is a bunch of them. I see a negotiated SLI coming under greater scrutiny from the SWA pilots than the AT pilots. So the irony I predict (and this is for you General), is that if the SLI goes to arbitration, it will be because the SWA pilots voted the negotiated SLI down.

True statement! I would add that Gary Kelly might make the Southwest Pilots, "an offer they can't refuse" to keep it from arbitration.
 
I'm going fishing tomorrow. What are you guys gonna do?

Gup
Commuting home right now on you guys, then going to my son's soccer game (should just make it), swimming (been teaching him all winter, he's just about got it), then a BBQ b-day party for a good friend of mine in the evening. It's gonna be a great weekend! :)

Ty, you taking the boat out? Looks like a beautiful day out your way...
 
Who has the tougher job? The SWA MC, or the AT MC? I think clearly the SWA MC has the tougher job. They have a determined group of FO's and junior CA's looking for protection with this SLI and there is a bunch of them. I see a negotiated SLI coming under greater scrutiny from the SWA pilots than the AT pilots. So the irony I predict (and this is for you General), is that if the SLI goes to arbitration, it will be because the SWA pilots voted the negotiated SLI down.
Careful... I got yelled at for posting something similar about two weeks ago. :rolleyes:
 
Your own boss said you couldn't grow without us. His words, not mine. Sounds to me like you needed us more than you know.

Do I really need to repost all the things you EX ceo said about AAI...for the fourth time. He didnt paint a rosy picture for AAI thats for sure. What a bunch of morons.
 
Riiiiigggghhhhttttt.

The latest statement from GK on May 10th was a week AFTER DOCC, two weeks AFTER DOJ approval, and six weeks AFTER AAI shareholder approval. Who is GK trying to appease now?

Me thinks he may be trying to inject some reality into the thought processes of his own troops.

AAI was the one looking for a buyer. Some of you guys have the spin machine in weekend overdrive.

Looks like there has been a pr campaign going on. While I appreciate you posting "facts," no data at all has been posted here.

Truth be told, it's now out of all of our hands. It appears the deck has been stacked on the one side. On the other, they are focused on the transaction and the history of that companies previous transactions.

In the end we will each be making a decision on our futures. For you it's what Gk said which will determine your vote and I respect your virtues. Likewise I respect 9s. You guys believe in what you believe in and so be it.

I think I'm done with this for awhile. It's obvious from many posts on flight info that certain people do not want a negotiated solution. We can all acknowledge there are certain risks to arbitration. Some of these things are seniority, some are culture and others are work enviornment for example. I can see a very divisive attitude and position on the matter. I'll just accept it as a matter of fact.

Happy flying to y'all. Happy fishing. Happy boating.

Time to shut my mouth.
 
Actually, it was GK who came to Fornaro looking to make a deal.
 
AAI was the one looking for a buyer. Some of you guys have the spin machine in weekend overdrive.

Looks like there has been a pr campaign going on. While I appreciate you posting "facts," no data at all has been posted here.

Truth be told, it's now out of all of our hands. It appears the deck has been stacked on the one side. On the other, they are focused on the transaction and the history of that companies previous transactions.

In the end we will each be making a decision on our futures. For you it's what Gk said which will determine your vote and I respect your virtues. Likewise I respect 9s. You guys believe in what you believe in and so be it.

I think I'm done with this for awhile. It's obvious from many posts on flight
info that certain people do not want a negotiated solution. We can all acknowledge there are certain risks to arbitration. Some of these things are seniority, some are culture and others are work enviornment for example. I can see a very divisive attitude and position on the matter. I'll just accept it as a matter of fact.

Happy flying to y'all. Happy fishing. Happy boating.

Time to shut my mouth.

Don't think you and your airline are the exception. Every recent merger has had arbitration for their SLI. A negotiated settlement just isn't likely, but could happen if the SWA NC reaches down deep and gives every AT Capt a number ensuring him/her a Capt slot on the list. I don't see that from SWAPA. But, maybe arbitration will yield that, and that is why the AT guys will ask for it. It's human nature, and it's business.


OYS
 

Latest resources

Back
Top