Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
Double pay sounds nice, but I *ALWAYS* want the ability to politely decline it. I plan my life for certain events and I certainly don't mind helping out if I have nothing going on, but if I do and it's important, and I held it off in my bid,,, no, thanks. THAT'S what's nice about being able to refuse a downline draft or a reassignment that takes you out of the footprint of your original pairing.PCL, the no dowline draft into a day off sounds nice, but if you are JA'd into a day off at SWA it pays double time.
Moderator hat on:General, If the US/AW was the other way around and it was AW that was almost shut down, the AW guys would not have been given a relative seniority integration as high as it was.
Guys, we are not going to debate USAir/AWA on this thread. I understand you're quoting it for historical past precedent purposes, and that's fine, but let's not get into a "what-if" and the supporting arguments behind Nicalau. There's USAir/AWA threads for that or you can start a separate thread titled "how Nicalau applies to the AAI/SWA integration".
Trying to keep this thread clear of the non-AAI/SWA pilots who are still irritated about Nicalau and will start debating it in this thread if left unchecked. As I've said before, I understand it's very near and dear to their hearts, but it's gone on for years with the possibility of lasting years more, and it has to stay compartmentalized for the good of the FI community.
/mod
Neither AirTran nor Southwest are a company in trouble. As has been said, the most applicable example for past precedent is NWA/DAL: two healthy companies growing independently that decide, for strategic purposes, to merge. There's always an "acquiring carrier", and about 50% of the cash being handed out for the deal is immediately recaptured by the cash we have on hand. It's a sweetheart deal for management, that's for certain.