Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

SWA, Airline of the year

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I agree with wavey....

If there were people leaving Delta, that's an asset when headed to negotiations. Sure, the airline may say "we have a stack of resumes THIS high!" but the demand for good pilots is outstripping the supply and every airline is worried about where their next class is coming from no matter what the paint job.

Just because somebody leaves an airline, its for personal reasons, not because they are stepping stones usually.

Plus why would an airline ant to risk losing someone already trained and checked out at their airline. But than again, we're talking about MBAs....
 
I'd pile on, but you're stealing my dog on bubba flop- get your own material
The rumor around SWA is that the last round of hiring we lost 6 new hires to delta.
After 3 years of contract negotiations I say good-
Those are arrows in our quiver and dispel mgmt's idea that we're the be all end all and overpaid in aviation.
I'd welcome it anyway bc I think pilots should make the best choice for them, but it's never in any way screwing an airline.
You've said a lot of ridiculous things flop- this is the 10th dumbest. Which only goes toward saying just how dumb the other 9 were.

I have to admit I lost the handle in this debate. I indeed misused/misapplied the word "screw". Should have maybe said "trade(d)"? Idk, anyway. To the original poster: what it seemed your thought process was by coming over to this thread from your other original thread, is that you wanted to know if Alaska or United would be better leverage into SWA. Bad thinking imho. Choose the one you'll be happiest with in the event SWA doesn't call. It seems obvious that you understand all this as well, so let me just say: UAL is a dumpster fire (figuratively speaking) right now and I think it will be for a long time. If you want a happy/harmonious place to work we're maybe not it.
 
Last edited:
It goes way deeper, and there's a lot of blame to go around. We have the CEO we have because he was willing to say yes to the merger. (Right after a fairly solid CEO had said no) I don't think a CEO can fix this. The sUAL employee group is so deeply demoralized and institutionalized it's likely beyond recovery. This is true especially of the senior FA group, who will almost every leg make some extraordinary effort to humiliate customers. They were offered an early out, but not many of the worst offenders took it. They'd rather ruin the place, and they might succeed.

That's the most immediate of our many problems imo. But there's a lot more and they're all big.
 
Thanks for the reply. Too bad they didn't take the early out. Hope you guys can turn it around. My personal opinion is that a new, strong CEO would help.
 
It goes way deeper, and there's a lot of blame to go around. We have the CEO we have because he was willing to say yes to the merger. (Right after a fairly solid CEO had said no) I don't think a CEO can fix this. The sUAL employee group is so deeply demoralized and institutionalized it's likely beyond recovery. This is true especially of the senior FA group, who will almost every leg make some extraordinary effort to humiliate customers. They were offered an early out, but not many of the worst offenders took it. They'd rather ruin the place, and they might succeed.

That's the most immediate of our many problems imo. But there's a lot more and they're all big.

Flop, there you go talking like Smisek at the Annual meeting. Cute soundbite but blaming the UAL people, that excuse is old and tired. Not everything is the legacy UNited peoples fault. You had a work group that was beaten and starved from being a champion boxer to a stick figure, then you guys merge and the CAL management came in over their head. They can't manage something so large, so its plain easy to just blame an employee group for management failures. We merged the NWA side who were probably the most militant in the industry without trouble here at Delta, so why the issue there.

That stick figure wants to eat now and can you blame them? I would stand up to this weak management team also and demand more instead of being a CAL legacy and rolling over and playing dead.

Just my opinion but I do agree that a new CEO is needed.
 
Let me ask you Bill: Are you aware the early out for these older, senior FAs was $100k? A hundred large buys a lot if cat food my friend. Also this is something both pilot groups feel the same about for the most part. You knew that?

NWA had had a merger with Republic. Your airline merged in Western. This is a first for UAL, so it's not going real smooth. Factor that in and your thesis is wrong.

Additionally, don't get fooled by the UAL pilot talking point that these are all "CAL" people running this place now. These weren't the CAL shot callers, these are a bunch of Bobs that could have been from either side really. Mgt here now are primarily the types who said "yes" when Larry K declined.
 
Sorry Flop....I usually side with you in lurker mode but what does a Flight Attendant making 100k buyout have anything to do with CAL people mucking up the merger?

Try again.....
 
Ok, one more try. You have to be ready to receive a good CEO. That's why a good one had to step out of the way and another step in. sUAL has not been ready for solid mgt, and offering the senior FAs a more than fair deal to retire would have been a step in the right direction. The pilots have moved in the right direction.

I can tell that you're not fully considering how key it is that this is merger 1 for sUAL. That is huge, especially when you consider they were accustom to putting their fellow alpa pilots on the street after taking their airplanes. (Other work groups got no better) These guys wiped their butts with merger policy; Just correcting them back to center was at least as big a undertaking as any DAL had with NWA. Not defending mgt, I just understood that when Kellner bailed this was more than likely our best hopes for company trajectory. Pilots have done a pretty good job of getting where we needed and wanted to be. Other work groups? We have to wait and see. They can shut it down just as sure as anybody else can
 

Latest resources

Back
Top