landlover
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2005
- Posts
- 1,365
What is it with this generation of kids that cannot take responsibility for their actions? Geesh!
probably raised by a spineless generation aka babyboomer parents.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is it with this generation of kids that cannot take responsibility for their actions? Geesh!
A issue here is that a pilot would rather risk his career and life rather than suffer the company consequences. Nice safety culture we have here
I'll take a stab at it. It is ironic that the pilot tipped the van driver for helping him get to the plane that morning then the guy turned around and stopped him from getting to the plane. Either way, i think he was pointing out the humor in it more than saying he shouldn't have snitched. I think we would all agree that this pilot was an idiot for what he did and the van driver, although he did "snitch", did the right thing.
Dave
PS It's ironic that a guy with the name Little Mojito is bashing someone for drinking.
Bull. The van driver is a prick. He could have confronted the pilot in the van. If he would have let the pilot know he was calling the police, I'm sure the pilot would have gone back to the hotel with the van driver. The van driver is a rat, plain and simple. It's still the pilot's fault also, but the van driver is a scumbag.
Bull. The van driver is a prick. He could have confronted the pilot in the van. If he would have let the pilot know he was calling the police, I'm sure the pilot would have gone back to the hotel with the van driver. The van driver is a rat, plain and simple. It's still the pilot's fault also, but the van driver is a scumbag.
I'm thinking you comment is nothing more then flamebait. Your saying it's the van drivers fault the pilot showed up drunk to fly. Whatever happened to taking responsibility for your own actions. It's not the van drivers job to pull someone off a flight for being drunk. We could also blame the hotel or front desk person. Do you know how stupid you sound to most people.
I had the opportunity to speak to a hotel staff and a pilot who works for the same company. It is not a great story and it is upsetting that multiple incidents have occurred within the same company in the last 12 months.
That may be the rule at your airline. However, the DOT's rules say thatYes. Showing up at the airport after an overnight with fellow crewmembers, in the absence of reporting yourself unavailable to crew scheduling, is considered intention to operate.
That may be the rule at your airline. However, the DOT's rules say that
"Reasonable Suspicion" cannot be acted upon unless the crew member is ON the a/c. Up to the point that one foot is on that a/c you can STILL call off/be pulled aside, etc "no harm, no foul." The lawyers on both sides can argue "intent to operate" but the threshold for a test is presence on the a/c.
As for being a crime to be at the airport drunk, I believe the charge could only be Public Intoxication. There could be company policy violations with being drunk in uniform, conduct unbecoming, etc.