midlifeflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2003
- Posts
- 2,091
- Base airport
- KTTA
There was no implication. There was a completely unwarranted inference. The difference between the two is essentially an issue of responsibility. The speaker is responsible for an implication; the listener for an inference.Originally posted by FurloughedGal (snipped)
First, I do not have a "chip on my shoulder." I thought that it was a very interesting pronoun choice, implications being that only a female flight instructor could make such an egregious error.
Question: Would you have made the same gender-biased assumption if I had used "he"?I believed that your response was meant to be a derogatory statement. Since you are stating that it was not, I apology if I offended you in anyway.
No apology is necessary. I gave up being offended by people like you long ago.
Besides, your "apology" sounds a bit like a student I had once. After a ground session on aircraft power plants and magnetos, we took off to the practice area. Enroute, I asked him what would happen if the battery went dead, other than the loss of lights and avionics. He said "Nothing," a correct answer, but with a tone and a look that added, "I really don't believe that, even though you said so. I really believe that this airplane will fall out of the sky if we lost the battery."