Suburban Air Freight

[CUBMAN]

First 135 job

I worked at Central Air. The TKS system is good but if it fails when you need it, and sooner or later it will, your S.O.L. It has two pumps as I recall. Both need to be operational but not according to the boss/owner. Get my meaning? Central would be my last choice. Actually they wouldnt even be on my list. Pay is downright offensive, maintenance was poor. Baron Aviation in Rolla, Mo was supposed to be pretty good too from what an old friend of mine claimed, at least he was happy with it. Best of wishes to your nephew. Remember that there are a lot of crummy operators out there and to hold out for a good one. It could be the most important decision one makes.

 

[TIGV]

The pay IS offensive, WHILE on probation......which coincides with the 6 month agreement I spoke about earlier, this would tend to suggest that Cubman was one of the guys who broke that agreement, maintenance for a 135 operator at Central is above the standard, it aint an airline job folks, it's 135.. F R 8 ! You want to make your time and move on then Central is for you, got a bunch of time ? Then they aint.
Nobody suggested it's a place to retire from folks but as 135 operators go, they are pretty tough to beat for low time guys looking to get what they need and shuffle on, you want to talk about OFFENSIVE pay ? How about a 4 to 7 year upgrade at a regional paying in the twenties....gimme a break.

 

[CUBMAN]

Whoa there TIGV. Nothing I said would suggest that I broke the training agreement at Central. You did. I agree with you that while it is not a place to retire from, a pilot should expect and deserves to fly safe equipment that is maintained to at LEAST the minimum as precribed by Part 135. They (the certificae holder) are obligated by law to do so and we as pilots should not have to subsidize a companies bottom line by looking the other way when neccessary stuff is inoperative of unairworthy. The pay is obscene and it DOES coincide with the agreement. You dont start making even crappy pay until your contract has expired. By then you should be able to go to the commuters for even more insult. But Central Air isnt the only offender out there. Theres way too many to list. Theyre like fleas on a dog.

We as pilots need to look out for others when the company wont or when the FAA cant. Its these companies that give good ones bad names. Now Ive said more than I wanted to regarding this and I mean you no disrespect. Of course its not the end to this type of argument. I ONLY wanted to pass along some useful information to jetbluedogs nephew so that he could make an informed decision. Look somewhere else. There are better places to work. And who says you have to work for a freight-hauler anyway. Ive seen many other opportunities out there for the lower experienced pilot that doesnt require the amount of risk that you will incur at the lower rung of the ladder type operator.

Now if you are the owner of Central Air or the chief pilot... you can disregard this.

Respectfuly

CUBMAN

 

[TIGV]

Well said Cubman, I agree.
Nope, I'm not the owner or CP, in fact the owner is the CP, I've flown for central twice, once over 5 years ago for 6 months and once again after being unemployed, about 18 months ago.
No I didn't like the pay either, what I'm saying is that for low time guys looking to build piston twin time it's going to be difficult to find an operator having a standard fleet with GOOD anti-ice gear and weather avoidance ( strikefinder ) in every plane.
The AC500 is a great flying machine on one engine and with a strikefinder and TKS on every plane, about the safest way to build time out of all the 135 haulers out there.

 

[CUBMAN]

TIGV;

Youre right. The AC500 is a really nice machine and the TKS works so well that its not even funny. It CAN get a person out of trouble. But I had it fail on me once when I really needed it and I had a few tense moments to say the least. Never again will I discount the power of prayer. I guess that at that particular time I was a little complacent about it because it does such a good job as an anti-ice system. Cheers.

CUBMAN

 

[145Captain]

Interview

Does anybody know anything about the interview there?

 

[Art Vandalay]

Art,

If the plane has a tks system, you pretty much have to get out of the ice don't you? If it has boots, I can't use up all of the boots like I can if the plane has an alcohol system. Doesn't leave as many options. Perhaps "weird" is bad syntax.

Voss

It looks like there has been some good posts defending the TKS system. In my opinion, anytime you are in icing conditions worse than "light" you should change altitudes in an attempt to get out of it. Our planes are equipped with a 6.5 gallon reservoir which lasts for 2.5 hours on the normal setting, and half that on maximum. We also carry about 5 spare gallons in the aft cargo compartment. It has definitely helped me through a decent winter here in the Northeast.

I do have experience using de-ice boot systems on smaller twins and it seems to work okay. I would take the TKS system anyday, and am glad my company opens it's wallet for $8/gallon TKS fluid.

Art V., Architect

 

[Pop Alexandra]

I would also be interested in how they undertake their interviews.
Any details would be highly appreciated.
______________________________________________
Alexandra from air freight