midlifeflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2003
- Posts
- 2,125
- Base airport
- KTTA
- Ratings
- Commercial ASEL, CFI-ASE, CFII
Just being a bit hyper-technical here, so forgive me. But misunderstanding what organizational limited liability means and doesn't mean is so widespread and potentially disastrous to the person who thinks there is protection where there is none.FN FAL said:That is true, if they can prove NEGLIGENCE, they can pierce the corporate veil to sue...and that is at it should be.
An individual's responsibility for his own actions in the tort sense (causing injury to person or property by acting intentionally or failing to act reasonably) is not a "piercing" issue. There's no veil to begin with. The liability that these entities limit tend to be exclusively contractual.
That would mean that if the hypothetical dead student's family decided to sue =exclusively= on the theory that the student had a =contract= to receive quality instruction, the individual instructor would be out if the contract were with a corporate entity. But as soon as we move to "this CFI gave bad instruction" we are back to individual responsibility.