Upncoming,
OK, so number 2 is wrong, fair entough. do you have some support for that? I thought I'd seen an interpretation which stated it was legal, but perhaps not. In either case, don't worry too much about my logbooks, they can pass the sniff test. I wouldn't worry too much about my safety pilot time either, I have, I think, 2.2 hours of safety pilot time logged. I logged it because conventional wisdom said that you should. After the second flight logged that way, I thought about what I was doing and asked myself why I was putting it in my logbook. My preference was to have my logbook reflect flying that I had actually done, and I wasn't doing any flying ...soooo I stopped logging safety pilot time. I don't think that safety pilot time is necessarily wrong, per se, I just chose not to put any more in my logbook.
>>>>>"Sorry, my benchmark for "ethical" behavior will be the regs"
Well, generally speaking, the law is about a low a bench mark as one can find for morality. Even the most ethically stunted among us can grasp that laws and regulations frequently fail to proscribe unethical behavior. In some cases, laws actually require unethical behavior ... but that is another discussion. The point is, and this point has been made before, and you still seem to be missing it, is that legality is *not* the sole determiner of ethics.
Essentially, your attitude is "whatever I can get away with under the regulations is just fine" That is not ethics, that's convenience. There's a vast gulf of difference between the two. You may be unable to appreciate the difference, hopefully others can.
Lastly, to address your whinging about the "barrage of negative comments"; The negative comments are kinda the whole point ... yet another point you seem to be missing. What I would hope a young aviator would draw from this entire discussion would be that while you may find a few who won't object, the staggering majority of the aviation community thinks that triple logging is a bit sleazy.