Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Spanair (SAS) MD-80 Crash on Takeoff in Spain

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Update

http://blog.wired.com/cars/2008/08/hundreds-feared.html

Air safety experts say preliminary reports suggest the left-side engine on Spanair Flight 5022 caught fire or exploded as the airliner approached maximum take-off speed, causing the plane to skid off the runway in a crash that killed 153 people.

Witnesses say the Pratt & Whitney engine caught fire as the plane made its second attempt to take off from Barajas airport, causing the MD 82 to veer off course. The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, which is joining the investigation, said the plane "broke apart" on impact after skidding off the runway in a plume of thick smoke.

Arthur Alan Wolk, a lawyer who specializes in aviation safety, told us he suspects engine failure caused the crash and the plane's speed contributed to the death toll. "Often times passengers end up walking off the plane after an engine failure," Wolk says.

According to a report from Sky News, witnesses saw the plane's left engine catch fire just as the aircraft reached maximum runway speed and started to lift. The plane apparently broke in two on impact. "It's 150 feet long," Wolk says of the MD-82. "And when it hit the runway, it came down hard."

The plane, bound for the Canary Islands, carried 162 passengers, six crew members and four other airline employees. The airline hasn't released the death toll, but Spain's Development Minister, Magdalena Alvarez, said 19 people survived the mid-afternoon crash.
The Spanair plane was 15 years old, according to Bloomberg. The Associated Press reports that the pilot reported a problem with a gauge that measures the air temperature outside the plane, but it was repaired -- delaying the flight -- and the plane later took off. Alvarez said the cause of the accident "seemed to be an error during take-off," but Spanish media quoted unnamed sources saying the engine caught fire.

The aircraft was fitted with a Pratt & Whitney JT8D-217c engines, and Wolk says it isn't the first time that model's had problems. A Delta Airlines MD-88 had an engine fail during takeoff in Pensacola in 1996, killing to passengers when pieces of the engine penetrated the cabin.

McConnell Douglas built more than 1,100 MD-80s between 1979 and 1999. Generally considered a safe and reliable workhorse, the planes have been plagued by a recent spate of problems including issues with the plane's wiring and horizontal stabilizer, and more than 400 people have died in MD-80 crashes during the past five years. Questions about the MD-80's hydraulic system wiring prompted the Federal Aviation Administration to ground hundreds of the planes earlier this year for mandatory inspections.

The plane that crashed Wednesday in Madrid was owned by Spanair, a financially troubled subsidiary of Scandinavian Air System. Aviation Week reported earlier this month that Spanair plans to reduce capacity and cut over 1,000 employees, a move that had the airline's pilots considering a strike. Standard & Poors said Spanair, which SAS had been trying to sell, probably now has "no future," according to Bloomberg.
 
On pprune, consistent with some other reports, it now appears it got very briefly (just a few meters) airborne, then went off the side of the runway and into a ravine between the parallel runways, breaking up as a result of going down the ravine.
 
My money's on this:

A "no-flap" takeoff attempt.

Reports are:

1) no "engine fire or explosion" despite what "eyewitnesses" said.

2) Used the whole runway, got briefly airborne, flipped over.

3) Pilots were distracted by financial insolvency, labor issues, and a return-to-gate maintenance event.

I love eyewitness accounts!
 
My money's on this:

A "no-flap" takeoff attempt.


While that's a possibility, highly unlikely with the takeoff config warning unless they didn't extend to flaps 11/Optimum and somehow the warning didn't annunciate.

Some survivors reported hearing a loud bang from the left engine and that the aircraft didn't seem to be going fast enough to lift off.

If the crew dealt with a left engine failure on takeoff, it seems odd that the a/c would impact right of runway centerline unless somehow more aileron than rudder authority was used to counteract the adverse yaw. Aileron use in this situation could be real problem because only 5 degrees of aileron movement will cause the flight spoilers to augment the ailerons in the turn with the MD80 series.

My thoughts and prayers go out to the families, loved ones, and those that perished.
 
Last edited:
At a friend's of mine (MD80 capt) former company a crew took off in an MD with 0 flaps fully loaded at an airport in the Canarian Islands, destination of flight 5022. Somehow they managed to get it off the ground and the FDR showed three VERY steep banks at low altitude. How they could miss it on the checklists and no warnings going off is a mystery to me.

Not nice to be a pax on that flight!

While that's a possibility, highly unlikely with the takeoff config warning unless they didn't extend to flaps 11/Optimum and somehow the warning didn't annunciate.

Some survivors reported hearing a loud bang from the left engine and that the aircraft didn't seem to be going fast enough to lift off.

If the crew dealt with a left engine failure on takeoff, it seems odd that the a/c would impact right of runway centerline unless somehow more aileron than rudder authority was used to counteract the adverse yaw. Aileron use in this situation could be real problem because only 5 degrees of aileron movement will cause the flight spoilers to augment the ailerons in the turn with the MD80 series.

My thoughts and prayers go out to the families, loved ones, and those that perished.
 
I read on another thread that it's been reported that investigators found a thrust reverser deployed. Doesn't say which thrust reverser.
 
I read on another thread that it's been reported that investigators found a thrust reverser deployed. Doesn't say which thrust reverser.

That would explain the "bang" and the crash.

Obviously a major malfunction.

Someone's in BIIIIIG trouble.
 
Read yesterday investigators looking at the wreckage found the right thrust reverser deployed. Now they need to determine whether the thrust reverser deployed on takeoff or deployed due to impact.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top