waveflyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2005
- Posts
- 10,005
Funny!
Because certainty is better than uncertainty. Having a negotiated list that was fair was a far superior alternative than going to arbitration where the outcome would be unknown. Unfortunately, it wasn't possible to achieve a fair outcome in negotiations, so the MEC decided that arbitration was the only possible avenue. It had nothing to do with delaying or poisoning any well. It was just an MEC doing their job: trying to get the best possible outcome for their members.
No, I don't disagree. I've said it before, in fact. The pilot group was so irrationally afraid after the public threats began that he could have stapled everyone, imposed a permanent B-scale, and prohibited captain upgrades for 20 years, and the pilots still would have voted for it. The level of fear was off the charts.
This is where you go off the reservation. Gary didn't pick this list based upon some complex formulation of what experts came up with. He picked this list because he believed it was the worst thing he could do to us and still not look like a monster. He wanted to continue being able to claim the "Golden Rule," and he thought this was the worst he could do and get away with it. He went a bit too far, though, because you'll have a hard time finding any AirTran pilot who doesn't burst out laughing when someone mentions the Golden Rule. AirTran pilots voted out of fear, nothing else. They'll never trust Gary, Mike, or SWA again. They'll never feel the way about SWA that you do. He shouldn't have pushed the envelope quite so far. Now he has a quarter of his pilot group who don't believe the SWA hype.
Yes, we've already established that you're delusional.
No thanks.
I'm the delusional one? You have a frank Lorenzo quote in your signature-
Telling.
And yeah- you're an arrogant kid aren't you- some of us have been around a while- and got started every bit as young as you w/o buying their first job- but it's irrelevant
I'm still asking the question you refuse to answer-
Lay it out- if losing on average 2.5 years of seniority wasn't fair, then what was?
Give details. What would the list have to look like in order for you not to be whining?
It's my opinion you would be poisoning the well in your ALPA loyalty even if swapa was stapled- prove me wrong- what did your FAIR list look like?
You're very clear that it was unfair- so what was fair then?