Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Southwest Air CFO:On Track To Meet, Beat '06 Earnings Goal

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

canyonblue

Everyone loves Southwest
Joined
Nov 26, 2001
Posts
2,314
Southwest Air CFO:On Track To Meet, Beat '06 Earnings Goal

By Ann Keeton, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

CHICAGO -(Dow Jones)- Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) is on track to meet or beat its goal of increasing earnings by 15% in 2006, Laura Wright, chief financial officer, said during a conference Webcast on Wednesday.

For the second quarter, the low-cost airline expects both revenue and costs to rise, the executive said. Southwest will continue to introduce modest increases in ticket prices to cover added costs for fuel and operations, Wright said.

Southwest's business will grow between 8% and 9% this year, as planned, Wright said, as the company adds 33 aircraft."We have tried to find some more aircraft, but there aren't any out there," she said. Long-term growth plans, with new aircraft orders from Boeing Co. (BA), remain intact, she said.
Compared with other low-cost carriers, it's relatively easy for Southwest to grow, Wright said. With a large flight network that serves more than 60 cities, it's easy for the airline to add flight frequencies and new flights to "connect the dots" between cities the airline serves.

By 2008 or 2009, Southwest will be ready to expand to international flying through code-sharing with partner ATA Airlines, Wright said.With industry-leading fuel hedges, including a 70% hedge this year at $36 a barrel, "we have a significant advantage over competitors on fuel until 2010," Wright said. "Our challenge is to keep our ex-fuel CASM (cost per seat-mile) flat." The airline remains optimistic that non-fuel costs in 2006 will be flat with 2005.

On the revenue side, industry trends remain positive, Wright said. The strength of passenger traffic this year "has surprised us somewhat.
 
canyonblue said:
By 2008 or 2009, Southwest will be ready to expand to international flying through code-sharing with partner ATA Airlines, Wright said.

Hmmmm....wonder how WN pilots are going to feel when they taxi up to a gate after flying 5 legs to drop off pax getting on an ATA bird going one leg to London or something....

If this happens it would be great for the folks at ATA but if I were a WN pilot, I may have a little heartburn over it. I hope it somehow works great for all. I would love to go back to Intl flying....this domestic stuff is not for me!!

Just curious what others think....

RV
 
The heartburn is starting.

Code share and scope will be big parts of our new contract coming up, I'm willing to bet.

This is starting to "get talked about" in the cockpits and overnights more and more.

We'll see were it goes.
 
ATA For Now! said:
Hmmmm....wonder how WN pilots are going to feel when they taxi up to a gate after flying 5 legs to drop off pax getting on an ATA bird going one leg to London or something....

If this happens it would be great for the folks at ATA but if I were a WN pilot, I may have a little heartburn over it. I hope it somehow works great for all. I would love to go back to Intl flying....this domestic stuff is not for me!!

Just curious what others think....

RV

See I'm just the opposite. I'd much rather hit a six-legger and fly West-Coast short haul only. My ass can't take sitting in that seat for some of the long-haul stuff we're flying now...and it ain't for a lack of padding.

As far as scope limitations, I don't have enough info to form an opinion on whether or not we really need something like that here. Can anyone give me an idea why we'd need to limit our codeshare partner's flying using some specific examples?
 
"If this happens it would be great for the folks at ATA but if I were a WN pilot, I may have a little heartburn over it. I hope it somehow works great for all. I would love to go back to Intl flying....this domestic stuff is not for me!!"

With all due respect "ATA for now", why do you care?

Personally, it appears that the codeshare has been financially beneficial for both ATA and Southwest. In regards to the impact on employees though, I believe that the ATA group has pretty much had their a$$ handed to them in the form of furloughs and paycuts. No more MDW - Florida, LAX, SFO, PHX or DEN. The argument could be made that much of the growth at Southwest has been at the expense of ATA and it's employees (ATA went from 14 MDW gates to 1, with Southwest acquiring 10 additional gates in the deal). Although I do not work for WN, from the outside, it does not appear that there has been any impact whatsoever. As a matter of fact, the ATA reductions most likely helped with the Southwest growth model.

This is not "sour grapes", as most ATA employees understand that this is business, and that it is all about "leverage". I will say this though, any comments about "heartburn" are more likely based in arrogance and lack of information about what has truly taken place.

In closing, all of Southwest pilots that I have met have always been supportive of ATA's surivival. Why you would choose to stir the pot is beyond me.

Skipper
 
tzskipper said:
"With all due respect "ATA for now", why do you care?

Skipper

I care because I still have a seniority number at ATA. I miss the flying there very much. It would be great if ATA became the International carrier it once had the potential of becoming before the braintrust in the puzzle palace screwed it up. I have never worked with a finer bunch of airmen in my life and leaving was one of the toughest decisions I have ever made. The way things were looking, I really had no choice.The choice has worked out fairly well but domestic flying is just not the same. If ATA Mgmt can get their head out of their ass for a bit, I believe it will become a great place to work once again!

I was not trying to "stir the pot" as you put it, I was just curious what the folks at WN though of THEIR managements statements.

Now, back to your regularly scheduled bickering!

RV
 
Can you say merger? I think their certificates could a lot of value as we look for overwater destinations. Houston - S. America, Oakland - Hawaii, and who knows what else we could add.
 
merger? I don't think so. Buyout - maybe? Again, I have no idea.
 
Buy out or merger it all comes down to certificates. The finance company that owns ATA is known for turning property in 2-3 yrs for about 30% mark-up. So buy out maybe tho option.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top