Something Bush refused to do...

[prodigal]

Well, as long as we're putting things in perspective, let's remember that a little over 20,000 Indians lost their lives as the result of an earthquake nine months before 3,000 died in New York, Washington, and Shanksville. I don't remember reading about that on Flightinfo.com.

"Go get your encyclopedia and look up Richard M. Nixon (R), then come back and say that with a straight face.
That bar was lowered a long time ago, wil!

"

As to your first point, that earthquake, although a horrible tragedy was an act of God about which no one could do anything, unlike the intentional attacks again our innocent citizens by terrorists. What is the point of such a comparison?

As to your remark about Nixon, please remember that Nixon at least had the dignity to resign when he was finally caught, putting the good of the nation above his own in the end, unlike the Lying King Clinton who chose to parse words by saying it depends on what the meaning of is is. That man has no dignity or regard for our nation. He is only a pitiful, loathsome, self-serving degenerate. And IMHO he is much better than his wife.
And Nixon did accomplish much of great importance in international relations. I'll take Richard Nixon any day over Clinton.

 

[furloboy]

Battle of the Somme, 1 July, 1916: 54,000+ British casualties on the first day. That doesn't count the French or the bad guys.

 

[Dieterly]

Clinton was lying about getting a blow job, what's the big friggin deal?

 

[Timebuilder]

what's the big friggin deal?

Answer:

Who he was lying to.

 

[prodigal]

Clinton was lying about getting a blow job, what's the big friggin deal?

. . . and selling sensitive techology to the Chicoms, letting Osama go, no real response to WTC bombing in '93, Cole bombing . . . no big deal, right?
Do you not see a pattern here?

 

[Typhoon1244]

...letting Osama go...

Uh-uh. It's been proven time and time again that the guy who told Clinton's people that he "had" Bin Laden was full of sh_t...trying to make a quick buck off the U.S.A. "Yeah, I've got Osama. And he can be yours for a small fee...." Yeah, right.

Do you not see a pattern here?

Yeah, I see a pattern. Cole? Clinton's fault. The W.T.C. bombing? Clinton's fault.

Now how about September 11? The Bush people were given detailed info by the outgoing Clinton staff about what Bin Laden and al Quaeda were up to. The Bushies didn't want it because it had Clinton's stink on it. (Condaleeza Rice verified this in interviews with Time and the New York Times.) So what did W. do to stop 9/11 from happening?

He took the longest vacation in Presidential history. I guess he needed the rest.

Bush's Afghanistan campaign was a triumph in the fight against terrorism. Probably set al Quaeda back a decade. Now, instead of capitalizing on that momentum, we're jerking around in Iraq, waiting for Bin Laden to make his next move.

 

[flywithastick]

Go get your encyclopedia and look up Richard M. Nixon (R), then come back and say that with a straight face.

Nixon quit and lost 99% of his support.

Clinton and his supporters thought nothing of his crimes. How many presidents can be linked ot 50+ questionable deaths? What if one is on target. Ol' tricky Dick just lied about a burglary.

I can't see how anyone can defend him logically. He's easily the worst president in US history, hands down. Even worse than Roosevelt and his sending the country down the river with his new deal socialism.

 

[Bai B Nai]

Bill Clinton lied to a grand jury. You try that a see where you end up.

Bush got a BS from Yale and an MBA from Harvard. I don't think much of the Ivy League now, but that's got to account for something. And even if he got "gentleman C's", so did that genius Al Gore when he went to Harvard.

Wesley Clark, well what can you say? He's an egomaniac, name me a general who wasn't. And like most in the military, he leaned Republican. If a Democrat is going to win, let it be him. Who would you want, Howard Dean? He's a nut. GWB is going to win going away, you heard it here first.

 

[Typhoon1244]

I can't see how anyone can defend [Clinton] logically. He's easily the worst president in US history, hands down.

I'd debate you on this, but you lost a lot of credibility when you started defending the "chemtrail" nuts.

 

[siucavflight]

Your all nuts,
Clinton sucked as a president, and Bush sucks as a president. We need a normal person to run for president.
Reading all of you people sit back and argue who is better Bush or Clinton is like watching two little kids sit there and say my dad can beat up your dad.
I know people like to say the economy under Clinton was so great and so bad under Bush, well presidents dont have anything to do with how the economy is going.
BOTH GUYS SUCKED, get over it.