Brasilia Flyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2006
- Posts
- 116
120%,
You are a "female private parts cleaner"
Didn't know they had people for that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
120%,
You are a "female private parts cleaner"
120%,
You are a "female private parts cleaner" for bringing BS's post onto FI. Did you not read his post? He was very up front that after a Google search he had found information about the issue being discussed on the F&H website. All of you anti-SAPA guys need to back off on this one. BS is a VERY pro-pilot who I would back 100% if he would want to run for MEC chairman when ALPA comes onto property. He is not one of the management lackeys that we are used to in SAPA. There are many issues that are useful in getting ALPA on property. Slamming BS is not one of them.
The Book.. Confessions of a Union Buster is a great read.. it will show you who is capable of what in this country. http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_ss_g...=search-alias=aps&field-keywords=union+buster
PLEASE don't buy into the rhetoric. Just like you dont run out and buy Tide after seeing a Tide commercial on TV, try to use your mind and formulate what is really best for you going forward.
Don't worry, I'm using my brain. And as far as I've been able to detect, both sides have valid points... and both sides have some not-so-valid points. I'm not pro-union, and I'm not pro-company either. I'm pro-career (mine), and so far, I'm not convinced that either side has my best interests at heart. SKW to me is a good place to get in, get my time, and get the freak out. The only thing that appears to be threatening that plan right now is ALPA. I'm not saying that my mind is made up either way, but it does make one think.
-Goose
Don't worry, I'm using my brain. And as far as I've been able to detect, both sides have valid points... and both sides have some not-so-valid points. I'm not pro-union, and I'm not pro-company either. I'm pro-career (mine), and so far, I'm not convinced that either side has my best interests at heart. SKW to me is a good place to get in, get my time, and get the freak out. The only thing that appears to be threatening that plan right now is ALPA. I'm not saying that my mind is made up either way, but it does make one think.
-Goose
Thats part of the selfish problem I see with to many of our new F.O's...get my time and get out.
Listen I have been at SkyWest for a long time, I plan on staying for a career and with the experience i have seen over the last several years I have decided we need ALPA.
Just because you want to get your time and get out dont jeopardize my future for your quick upgrade so that you can eventually go work at an ALPA carrier and enjoy those pay and work rules they fought for!
Don't worry, I'm using my brain. And as far as I've been able to detect, both sides have valid points... and both sides have some not-so-valid points. I'm not pro-union, and I'm not pro-company either. I'm pro-career (mine), and so far, I'm not convinced that either side has my best interests at heart. SKW to me is a good place to get in, get my time, and get the freak out. The only thing that appears to be threatening that plan right now is ALPA. I'm not saying that my mind is made up either way, but it does make one think.
-Goose
At your Alaska, Delta, Continental, United, Fedex, Etc. Interview someday there is a good chance you'll get asked this by an Interview Captain... "I see you were at SkyWest during the ALPA drive. Did you participate and were you an ALPA supporter then?"
I don't think it's particularly selfish. It's just an opinion, and it won't keep me from working hard and doing a good job. I'm only saying that I don't plan to be at a regional my entire career. I don't think there's anything wrong with that.
Ok, you definitely know more about it than I do, and I actually welcome your input. The thing is, that no one has yet given me any reason why we need a union except "the grass may be greener at a union regional." And if we need a union, why does it have to be ALPA? The way it looks to me is that the same union representing both regionals and majors is a conflict of interest, and weakens ALPAs bargaining power. I'm not saying that SAPA is doing an adequate job (or that they aren't, for that matter), but I just wish there were more facts involved with the arguments that I've been hearing. It's just propaganda either way, and I don't find it particularly convincing.
Well, if are you say you are, your future really shouldn't be in jeopardy. I mean, I could say, using the same logic "don't jeopardize my quick upgrade because you want slightly better work rules and slightly higher pay." It works both ways. But then again, I guess that's why my vote counts just as much as yours.
I probably shouldn't worry about it though. If the union comes on, it will be a couple years before the contract gets hammered out, and by then I will hopefully be moving on or at least getting closer to it.
Oh well... politics, religion, and unions...
-Goose