Skywest Pay Vote in Effect

[Speedtape]

So, the last contract ASA negotiated which ALMOST brought payrates up to what Skywest pilots negotiated ten months earlier was cutting edge? Who was riding whose coat tails. Look it up. What are Skywest's rates? What are ASA's rates? Sky'west rates are a few pennies more. A few pennies more + 2% not counting the ALPA "tool" fee. ALPA HAS THE "TOOLS.". ASA used those tools to get the last contract up to speed with Skywest. In 2000, Skywest matched Comair's rates dollar for dollar. Where would you rather be working today, Comair or Skywest?

It's the same BS over and over and over again. Skywest is a great place to work. Tomorrow night at 8 p.m. new pay rates will be approved by a vote of the pilot group and the ASA pilot group will have a chance to negotiate a new contract year after next and good luck to them. I wish them the best. But stop with the "you've gotta have ALPA to get good pay scales and work rules" BS. It's just not true. If it was, Skywest wouldn't exist the way it does.

We're all pilots. We love what we do once the brake is released. Get over the misdirected bitterness toward other pilots who do the same thing you do every day. Relax. Enjoy life for a day. Then try it for two days.

Check your time line, Sport! Your rates followed ours.

 

[Speedtape]

I sit here shaking my head, but I have to remember how I felt 10 years ago when I didn't "really" understood what it meant to be in a pilot union. It's kinda like you've had your buggy pulled with a horse ones whole life, then one day you see a commercial for a car. "I gotta get me one of those things, I'm tired of that damn horse always getting me lost". Then one person says, "Don't get a Dodge (ALPA), you'll be even more lost". ???? huh. A few more people say it and pretty soon everyone who's never even driven a car isn't going to buy a Dodge. It doesn't matter if it's Chevy, Ford or Dodge, you still have to drive the car and if you get lost it's not the manufacturers fault. You're the one behind the wheel, you control where it goes.... just like a Union. (no matter the brand)

I personally feel the brand of a Union is much like the manufacturer of a car. A few bad design decisions and yes one car is worse than another, but for the most part, getting from A to B isn't on the manufacturer, but the driver (or in this case the pilot group). Now get out there and buy a car!

Bad analogies accompanied with flawed logic demonstrate a shallow understanding. Cheers!

 

[tzwarrior]

Bad analogies accompanied with flawed logic demonstrate a shallow understanding. Cheers!

shal·low

1. A message board response from Speedtape.

-----------------------------------------------------------
speed·tape

1. Flight Info poster of short responses providing little value.
2. Waster of bandwidth.

 

[Nevets]

NevJets, methinks, lacks either understanding or wisdom (or both):

It's my understanding that the troops at SWA are going to be flying the 800 for the current blended rate, which is to say, exactly the same as you mention as 90 for 50 save two elements: (a) the SWA troops are getting a 3% increase not tied to airframe based on profitability which keeps even their 'lower' rates tops--good for them; (2) your 90-50 argument is weak and only a 4th grader should buy it, simply stated: we get paid more for 70/90 flying than for 50 flying--it's the non-flying credit that is pegged at the lower rate. You would have been correct to state we fly the 90s for 70s rates but you didn't--instead you just sound like a broken, tired record with no real meaning. In sum, I don't believe SWA used a blended rate (or the IPA model) for the 738s that you specifically point out, but they will be the highest paid people regardless based on their existing scales; my guess is next time around they will get a slightly higher blended rate [in addition to performance-based raises--me likey], and you'll probably just keep making no real sense--you also proved my point about responses, even if wrong in content

That's what I'm getting at. Probably a poor choice of words. SWAPA will fly their entire fleet at a higher blended rate, even their non-flying credit. They will not create a lower rate for smaller aircraft as SKW essentially did with their large RJs. Now if SKW would have put ALL CRJ credit at the higher pay rate, you may have an argument.

I said:
Originally Posted by JoeMerchant
That's no different than any recent ALPA contract....Happens everywhere whether ALPA or not....

Nevet's response:


You are wrong. I saw it first hand here at ASA in 1998, when our first TA came out. I was on the ATR of which ASA only had 12. Most of our airplanes were RJs and Brasilias. Guess what happened. Year 6,7, and 8 of ATR captain rates took a PAYCUT while everyone else got a raise. But there were only a few folks who fell in that group, so it was OK. That was when I first really started to get involved in ALPA and ended up on the negotiating committee.

That first TA also had a very small FO raise.

Sorry, but you are either blinded by the BS, or you help manufacture the BS...not sure which.....

So pilots of one aircraft type didn't get 0 while the others got a raise? And there was no BHO for same aircraft types? And there wasn't a disproportionate pay increase to captains? The only thing you said is that some captains got pay cuts, which is not any of the things I mentioned. But I get your point though.