Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Willy21 said:That would be very interesting if it were true. I wouldn't put any money on it as the source is an intern. Then again maybe Skywest is ready to merge the ASA and Skywest list.
utahpilot said:We're getting all of the ASA SLC 70 seater flying within a month or two. That is why the letter is coming out and why we have 162 lines in Jan. with 100+ reserves, for now.
...at least that is what an intern in the SLC CP's office told my friend
enjoy
Bluto said:For now, chill out, enjoy your time at home and make RJ or brasilia noises while you make your morning commute.
Willy21 said:Look at it this way. For Skywest to get ASA's flying in SLC you would need to have about 15 70 seaters. I am not saying it won't happen, but in one to two months that would mean that those 70's would have to go from ASA to Skywest. That would give a big lift to the single carrier petition and might hurt the whipsaw effect. It would also piss a lot of ASA pilots off. Skywest might get those 70's over the next year or two and you might see ASA slowly removed from SLC. I wouldn't bet on that either. Skywest Inc. owns both of us but mother Delta calls the shots. They say who fly where with what and when. (example: CHQ in ATL, doesn't make sense but it is happening)
Oh really? They do make a skd saying a 70 or 50 on xxx route but they don't tell any of their DCI's how to run their companies. They have enough problems of their own. As for aircraft allocation and placement it is up to the DCI to position A/C and crews to do the flying.
What SkyW/ASA need to do is get shatbox America and Chittaco out of the mix in SLC/ATL. Another fleet type would certainly be good. It is always sad to see DCI flying taken from Comair, ASA and SkyWEst. The three top products out of the DCI line. Let's hope for 2006 for more mainline jobs and less selling out of pilot wages.
Halo_RJdriver said:Willy21 said:Look at it this way. For Skywest to get ASA's flying in SLC you would need to have about 15 70 seaters. I am not saying it won't happen, but in one to two months that would mean that those 70's would have to go from ASA to Skywest. That would give a big lift to the single carrier petition and might hurt the whipsaw effect. It would also piss a lot of ASA pilots off. Skywest might get those 70's over the next year or two and you might see ASA slowly removed from SLC. I wouldn't bet on that either. Skywest Inc. owns both of us but mother Delta calls the shots. They say who fly where with what and when. (example: CHQ in ATL, doesn't make sense but it is happening)
Oh really? They do make a skd saying a 70 or 50 on xxx route but they don't tell any of their DCI's how to run their companies. They have enough problems of their own. As for aircraft allocation and placement it is up to the DCI to position A/C and crews to do the flying.
What SkyW/ASA need to do is get shatbox America and Chittaco out of the mix in SLC/ATL. Another fleet type would certainly be good. It is always sad to see DCI flying taken from Comair, ASA and SkyWEst. The three top products out of the DCI line. Let's hope for 2006 for more mainline jobs and less selling out of pilot wages.
I smell Shautublic